| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When contemplating a real estate investment, it's crucial to research the builder's reputation and legal standing. This blog post delves into the builder H.R.DEVELOPERS, assessing their track record based on the legally documented cases against them, and offers insights for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Name: H.R.DEVELOPERSNumber of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Chhattisgarh
Legal Case Details
H.R.DEVELOPERS has been involved in a notable legal case where the appellant claimed that the builder had breached the provisions of Section-59 of the Act by failing to register with the authority. The respondent, in defense, contended that they had obtained development permit No.-8450 and had not submitted any application for registration for that project before the authority. However, it is essential to note that the case was closed after the project was eventually registered with CG RERA, indicating a late compliance with legal requirements.
Summary of Legal Case
- Claim: Violation of registration provisions
- Response: Development permit obtained; no application for registration submitted
- Verdict: Case closed after project registration
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
H.R.DEVELOPERS has faced one legal loss, reflecting possible negligence or oversight regarding the timely registration of projects. The implications of this verdict indicate that the builder may struggle with compliance to regulatory procedures initially, which could pose risks for future projects and buyer confidence.
Cases Won
Interestingly, while H.R.DEVELOPERS claims to have won one case, it’s important to highlight that the case did not result in a favorable outcome for the party involved in this loss—instead, it concluded with a late registration that suggests better compliance following legal scrutiny. The win, therefore, does not necessarily indicate strong legal standing; rather, it signifies a reactive approach to regulatory compliance.
Conclusion
Based on the limited yet significant data available, H.R.DEVELOPERS showcases a complex position in terms of legality and compliance. With a single recorded complaint resulting in one loss and an eventual registration, potential buyers should proceed with caution. This incongruence between claimed project handling and legal adherence highlights the necessity for potential buyers to do thorough due diligence.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Investigate Compliance History: Before making a purchase, check the builder's compliance history with local real estate authorities.
- Seek Testimonials: Look for reviews from previous clients to understand their experiences with H.R.DEVELOPERS.
- Request Documentation: Ensure you request and review all necessary documentation related to project registration and permits.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate a builder’s reputation and past projects.
- Consult Legal Experts: Engaging a legal expert can clarify any confusing terms or conditions within the contract.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit a completed project by the builder to assess quality and see their work firsthand.
In conclusion, while H.R.DEVELOPERS has made strides in compliance post-legal scrutiny, potential buyers should remain vigilant and take proactive steps to secure their investments in the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against H.R. DEVELOPERS, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: regulatory non-compliance and project registration disputes.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, encompasses the builder's violations of statutory provisions, particularly concerning project registration. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that the builder had breached Section-59 of the Act by failing to register their project before commencing work. The builder's defense centered around their possession of a development permit; however, the underlying issue of non-registration highlights a troubling pattern of disregard for legal requirements in this sector.
Project registration disputes represent another recurring theme in these cases. Here, the focus is not only on the need for registration but also on the implications of non-registration, which can lead to legal consequences and disputes with regulatory authorities. The aforementioned case illustrates this well, as the builder ultimately resolved the issue by registering the project with the CG RERA, indicating that the initial lack of registration was a significant concern.
Common reasons for bringing cases against the builder include regulatory non-compliance and disputes over project procedures. People may contest the builder’s actions when they believe there has been a violation of legal standards or when project delays are attributed to the builder's mismanagement. In the case of H.R. DEVELOPERS, the pattern suggests that contestants to the builder’s actions are primarily motivated by the builder’s failure to adhere to registration requirements.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements. Insufficient evidence to defend their actions, combined with a clear failure to meet statutory obligations, ultimately led to the rulings against them. The resolution of the case after the builder registered the project reinforces this, indicating that the initial failure to register was the critical factor in the legal dispute.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5B-AARA-2024-02367 | Chhattisgarh | The case was registered against M/s H. R. Develop… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | H. R. Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-URP-2024-02367/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_9ad8da8c-6f04-4158-ba67-9a6de5450297.pdf |