IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED

Overview of Imperia Structures Limited

Imperia Structures Limited is a notable player in the real estate sector, primarily operating in the states of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. With a considerable history in property development, the company faces scrutiny from current and potential buyers alike, especially regarding its legal history and complaint resolutions.

Legal Performance Analysis

In total, Imperia Structures Limited has received 53 complaints over time. Of these, the builder has won 7 cases while losing 46 cases. This indicates a somewhat concerning trend, as the majority of the legal outcomes have not favored the builder.

Patterns in Lost Cases

1. Withdrawal or Dismissal of Complaints: Several of the cases lost by the builder were either dismissed due to the complainants’ failure to appear or were withdrawn by the complainants, often suggesting issues with prosecution or satisfaction outside the tribunal. For instance, there were complaints dismissed for want of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Imperia Structures Limited, which it lost, reveals several insights into the nature of their disputes and the recurring themes surrounding them.

The key themes identified in these cases include the release of deposited amounts and disputes arising from claims tied to the dismissal of appeals. In these instances, the respondents consistently claimed that the appeals initiated by the builder had been dismissed, which directly led to their request for the release of amounts deposited during litigation.

The common reasons for the builder bringing cases to court typically revolved around contesting unfavorable decisions, seeking reversal of judgments, and disputing the penalties or financial liabilities they faced as a result of the tribunal’s actions. However, in the cases we've examined, it appears that such appeals were often met with dismissals, indicating a pattern where the builder might struggle to substantiate its cases against …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following insights.

Delayed Possession Claims:

A recurring theme in the disputes involves delays in handing over possession of flats to the buyers. Complainants have consistently claimed that the builder did not deliver their units by the agreed-upon date, often seeking significant interest payments for the delay.

Force Majeure Defenses:

In response to these claims, the builder frequently cited force majeure circumstances as justification for the delays. This defense revolves around unforeseen events that are beyond the builder's control, which they argued affected their ability to meet deadlines.

Interest Payment Disputes:

Another common issue is the disagreement over the percentage of interest applicable for delays. While complainants often seek high rates, the builder has been able to contest these demands and settle on significantly lower rates directed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The cases can be broadly grouped into several themes, showcasing different kinds of disputes brought to court.

One prevalent theme is the frequent withdrawal of claims, where complainants chose to dismiss their complaints for various reasons, often indicating that the matters had been settled amicably between the parties.

Another common theme is related to complaints regarding non-registration of projects, which highlights issues of regulatory compliance that buyers often raise.

Finally, there are instances where procedural non-compliance and failures to follow legal processes led to dismissals of cases, as seen when parties neglected to properly include relevant parties in their claims.

These cases demonstrate that complaints against the builder typically stem from issues like project registration, delays in delivery, or disagreements on procedural matters.

A noteworthy pattern is the withdrawal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis