| CIN | U70102DL2007PTC161698 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | 1121-A, 11TH FLOOR, DEVIKA TOWER-6, NEHRU PLACE, ABOVE MAIN ROAD NEW DELHI New Delhi DL 110019 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for homebuyers and investors alike. One such builder, Information TV Private Limited, has garnered attention in Haryana for its project undertakings. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's performance based on legal cases, analyzing both their successes and challenges to provide potential buyers with valuable insights.
Overview of Information TV Private Limited
Information TV Private Limited operates in Haryana and has registered a mixed yet informative track record concerning legal disputes and project completions. With only two complaints filed against them, the company showcases a proactive approach in addressing customer concerns.
Legal Case Details
Interestingly, throughout its brief legal history, Information TV Private Limited has emerged victorious in all its cases, achieving a complete success rate of 100%. This is particularly noteworthy given that there have been two cases where the builder faced complaints.
- …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Information TV Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily fall into a few key themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Compliance and Extensions, and Non-payment of Registration Fees.
- Delayed Possession Claims: One of the recurrent issues highlighted by appellants revolves around claims of delayed project completions.
- Regulatory Compliance and Extensions: Another theme emerges concerning regulatory compliance, specifically the adherence to the registration requirements of real estate projects.
- Non-payment of Registration Fees: The builder also faced disputes regarding the payment of registration fees. In one case, they successfully claimed to have deposited the deficit registration fee as per authorities' directives. This adherence to financial obligations played a critical role in their defense.
A common pattern that emerges from these summaries indicates that buyers or regulatory bodies often filed complaints due to perceived delays or …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!