CIN | U70102DL2007PTC161698 |
---|---|
Year Established | 5-Apr-07 |
Address | 1121-A, 11TH FLOOR, DEVIKA TOWER-6, NEHRU PLACE, ABOVE MAIN ROAD NEW DELHI New Delhi DL 110019 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for homebuyers and investors alike. One such builder, Information TV Private Limited, has garnered attention in Haryana for its project undertakings. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's performance based on legal cases, analyzing both their successes and challenges to provide potential buyers with valuable insights.
Information TV Private Limited operates in Haryana and has registered a mixed yet informative track record concerning legal disputes and project completions. With only two complaints filed against them, the company showcases a proactive approach in addressing customer concerns.
Interestingly, throughout its brief legal history, Information TV Private Limited has emerged victorious in all its cases, achieving a complete success rate of 100%. This is particularly noteworthy given that there have been two cases where the builder faced complaints.
Analyzing the cases Information TV Private Limited has faced, a pattern emerges regarding the nature of complaints. The main theme revolves around project timelines and adherence to regulations. Although the builder has managed to navigate these legal challenges successfully, it is evident that concerns may exist related to project completion and registration processes.
On the other hand, in the cases won, the builder has demonstrated a clear capacity to provide adequate responses to regulatory authorities, emphasizing compliance and timely communications. This ability to legally justify actions taken can be seen as a potential strength in the eyes of prospective buyers, illustrating the builder's commitment to following legal processes.
Based on the information analyzed, Information TV Private Limited shows a commendable record with a zero-loss rate in legal disputes, which speaks to their operational integrity. However, the complaints filed highlight a potential area of concern regarding the timely completion of projects. For potential buyers, while the builder's legal victories may incite confidence, vigilance regarding project timelines is advised.
In conclusion, while Information TV Private Limited has had successes in the legal arena, potential buyers should remain informed and proactive, considering the vital factors of project management when deciding on their investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Information TV Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily fall into a few key themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Compliance and Extensions, and Non-payment of Registration Fees.
A common pattern that emerges from these summaries indicates that buyers or regulatory bodies often filed complaints due to perceived delays or financial discrepancies. However, the evidence presented often favored the builder, showing that disputes might sometimes stem from misunderstandings or exaggerated claims.
Furthermore, Information TV Private Limited consistently succeeded in defending itself by presenting clear documentation and proof of compliance, such as application for project extensions and evidence of payment of fees.
This highlights a crucial takeaway: the written disputes frequently lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims against the builder. It indicates that some of these disputes were possibly misinformed.
In conclusion, this analysis sheds light on Information TV Private Limited's reputation in the broader real estate market. It reveals a strong track record of successfully defending against unjust claims.
Potential buyers should be aware that while legitimate disputes exist in real estate, accusations can sometimes be falsely exaggerated, leading to unnecessary legal contests.
Buyers are encouraged to carry out thorough research and seek reliable information when assessing a builder’s reputation and claims.
Informed decisions are essential when navigating the complexities of real estate transactions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1983 of 2019 | Haryana | The respondent deposited the deficit registration… | ["Deficit registrat… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Information TV Priv… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTk0NTU= | |
900 of 2022 | Haryana | Suo-motu complaint against respondent for not com… | ["Project Extension… | {"appellant_claim": "The respondent did not compl… | Haryana Real Estate… | Information TV Priv… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTM4NjU5 |