INNER URBAN INFRA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED logo

INNER URBAN INFRA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding Inner Urban Infra Estate Private Limited: A Builder's Profile

In the competitive real estate market, it is crucial for potential buyers to be well-informed about the builders they consider. Inner Urban Infra Estate Private Limited, with its operations concentrated in Karnataka, presents an interesting case worth exploring. This blog will delve into the builder's complaint history, legal outcomes, and provide insights for prospective buyers.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Inner Urban Infra Estate Private Limited has received a total of one complaint, which reflects a commendable handling of customer relations, given that complaints in the real estate sector can be quite common. Notably, the builder has won the single case filed against it, highlighting a strong defense against claims made by buyers.

Details of the Legal Case

  • Complainant’s Claim: The complainant alleged that Inner Urban Infra delayed the possession of a villa and failed to provide a solar water …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Project Specifications

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Inner Urban Infra Estate Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The primary disputes in these cases can be categorized into two main themes: 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Non-compliance with Project Specifications'.

These categories highlight the types of complaints that were most frequently raised by buyers.

In the notable case discussed, the complainant contended that the builder delayed possession of their villa and failed to provide a solar water heater, as stipulated in their agreement.

However, the builder defended their position by asserting that possession was delivered within the agreed time frame and the provision of a solar water heater was not mandatory.

A closer examination of the reasons for legal action illustrates that buyers often sought remedies for perceived delays in possession or failures to comply with project specifications.

This case reflects a common pattern where …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from INNER URBAN INFRA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.