No Logo Available

ISPRAVA VESTA PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (8 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Goa
CINU74900MH1992PTC065539
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressFirst Floor, 42A, Impression House G.D.Ambekar Marg, Wadala,Maharashtra,Mum bai , Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400031
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Isprava Vesta Private Limited operates primarily in the vibrant real estate market of Goa, where it has established a certain reputation amid a backdrop of legal scrutiny. Despite having registered eight complaints against the company, it’s noteworthy that they have managed to win all their cases to date. In this article, we will delve into the details of these legal challenges and offer insights for potential buyers considering properties from this builder.

Legal Case Overview

The complaints against Isprava Vesta Private Limited predominantly revolve around issues of project registration under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016. All eight complaints filed against the company were led by Ms. Deepti Agarwal, who claimed that various projects did not meet the registration requirements as stipulated by the Act.

Common Patterns in the Legal Cases

1. Nature of Complaints

All cases filed against Isprava Vesta primarily related to the failure …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Project Registration Compliance Exemptions from Registration Requirements Claims of Non-Ownership Validity of Regulatory Claims

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Isprava Vesta Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The recurring disputes generally revolve around claims related to project registration compliance, as a significant number of cases involved allegations that the builder did not register various projects per the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016.

Many of these claims were contested and resulted in the builder successfully defending itself by proving exemption from registration requirements or non-ownership of the projects in question.

In these cases, the opposing parties frequently argued that the builder should have registered their projects according to regulatory standards. Many complaints were filed by individuals, particularly Ms. Deepti Agarwal, asserting that projects such as 'Casa Brava', 'Estate De Escobar', and 'Villa Loto Bianco' were not registered as mandated.

However, Isprava Vesta Private Limited presented strong defenses, clarifying the legitimate circumstances that resulted in exemptions …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review