CIN | U74900MH1992PTC065539 |
---|---|
Year Established | 21-Feb-92 |
Address | First Floor, 42A, Impression House G.D.Ambekar Marg, Wadala,Maharashtra,Mum bai , Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400031 |
Company Status | Private |
Isprava Vesta Private Limited operates primarily in the vibrant real estate market of Goa, where it has established a certain reputation amid a backdrop of legal scrutiny. Despite having registered eight complaints against the company, it’s noteworthy that they have managed to win all their cases to date. In this article, we will delve into the details of these legal challenges and offer insights for potential buyers considering properties from this builder.
The complaints against Isprava Vesta Private Limited predominantly revolve around issues of project registration under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016. All eight complaints filed against the company were led by Ms. Deepti Agarwal, who claimed that various projects did not meet the registration requirements as stipulated by the Act.
All cases filed against Isprava Vesta primarily related to the failure to register projects as per the legal requirements. Each complaint mentioned a specific project, including 'Casa Brava', 'Estate De Escobar', and 'Villa Vivre'. The appellant consistently claimed non-registration, which signifies a potential misunderstanding of the legal framework surrounding RERA compliance or an oversight at the administrative level.
The builder's defense strategy appeared consistent across cases. Isprava Vesta argued that either the projects were completed before the RERA cut-off date or that they were merely contractors, not owners, of the projects in question. This highlights a common defense by the builder that hinges on interpreting regulatory exemptions effectively.
The Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) consistently sided with Isprava Vesta, ruling that under Section 3 of the RERA Act, registration was not necessary in the cited instances due to various qualifications met by the projects. This indicates that the builder effectively navigated the legal landscape pertaining to project classifications under RERA standards.
Despite the complaints, Isprava Vesta Private Limited has demonstrated a commendable track record with zero losses—winning all eight cases. Their successful defense indicates a strong legal team capable of articulating their compliance with RERA regulations. This can instill a sense of confidence in potential buyers about the builder's operational transparency and adherence to law.
Given the builder's clean slate in legal outcomes and their successful navigation of complex issues regarding project registration, Isprava Vesta appears to be a reliable entity within the Goa property market. The company’s ability to win all cases suggests that they maintain several critical documents and a clear understanding of the legal frameworks which govern their industry.
In conclusion, potential buyers should feel optimistic about engaging with Isprava Vesta Private Limited, provided they engage in adequate research and legal precautions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Isprava Vesta Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The recurring disputes generally revolve around claims related to project registration compliance, as a significant number of cases involved allegations that the builder did not register various projects per the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016.
Many of these claims were contested and resulted in the builder successfully defending itself by proving exemption from registration requirements or non-ownership of the projects in question.
In these cases, the opposing parties frequently argued that the builder should have registered their projects according to regulatory standards. Many complaints were filed by individuals, particularly Ms. Deepti Agarwal, asserting that projects such as 'Casa Brava', 'Estate De Escobar', and 'Villa Loto Bianco' were not registered as mandated.
However, Isprava Vesta Private Limited presented strong defenses, clarifying the legitimate circumstances that resulted in exemptions from registration or highlighted construction roles rather than ownership.
The builder won these cases largely due to two main reasons. Firstly, many of the complaints lacked substantial evidence or were based on misunderstandings of the regulatory framework, particularly concerning the exemptions under Section 3(2) of the RERA Act, which pertains to projects with limited units or those completed before a specified cut-off date. Secondly, the builder successfully demonstrated that they were fulfilling contractual obligations and adhering to legal requirements.
This pattern illustrates that the complaints often stemmed from misinterpretations of ownership and regulatory requirements rather than any malfeasance on the builder's part.
The outcomes of these disputes contribute positively to Isprava Vesta Private Limited’s reputation within the real estate market, demonstrating that they possess a solid foundation for defending against unjust claims effectively.
The cases reveal a trend where buyers may sometimes resort to legal channels, potentially fueled by misinformation or misunderstandings, rather than genuine grievances. As such, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough research and approach allegations against builders with a discernment acquired from reliable data.
In conclusion, while disputes in the real estate sector are not uncommon, potential buyers should carefully assess claims made against builders. The example of Isprava Vesta Private Limited serves as a reminder that allegations do not necessarily reflect the builders' integrity or operational practices. Collecting accurate information and understanding the nature of disputes can inform buyers when making essential decisions about engaging with real estate developers.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No.3/RERA/Complaint… | Goa | Ms. Deepti Agarwal filed a complaint against Ispr… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "Ms. Deepti Agarwal claimed t… | Ms. Deepti Agarwal | Isprava Vesta Priva… | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=MFFoOboYxkVH8uv+Sfh1CQ== |
3/RERA/Complaint (9… | Goa | Ms. Deepti Agarwal filed a complaint against Ispr… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "Ms. Deepti Agarwal claimed t… | Ms. Deepti Agarwal | Isprava Vesta Priva… | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=bL2wDRQu9ok6tDQ9x2fONg== |
No.3/RERA/Complaint… | Goa | Ms. Deepti Agarwal filed a complaint against Ispr… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "Ms. Deepti Agarwal claimed t… | Ms. Deepti Agarwal | Isprava Vesta Priva… | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=SMMF0ujiGkJ46uGcDx2CuQ== |
3/RERA/Complaint (4… | Goa | Complaint against Isprava Vesta Private Limited f… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Ms. Deepti Agarwal | Isprava Vesta Priva… | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=FNRKZa0oHjChrKeowa+auQ== |
No.3/RERA/Complaint… | Goa | Ms. Deepti Agarwal filed a complaint against Ispr… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "Ms. Deepti Agarwal claimed t… | Ms. Deepti Agarwal | Isprava Vesta Priva… | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=gU1n+5+rM3AUMEgX+GlGMQ== |