Builders & Projects - Real Estate Platform

IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS (AVADI) PRIVATE LIMITED

No of Complaints: 2
States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh

CIN	U45200TG2008PTC059512
Year Established	4-Jun-08
Address	M-22/3RT, Vijayanagar Colony Hyderabad TG 500057 IN
Company Status	Private

Introduction

In the complex world of real estate, selecting the right builder is a critical decision for potential home buyers. One builder that has garnered attention is IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS (AVADI) PRIVATE LIMITED, which operates primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This blog aims to provide an insightful assessment of IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS based on available legal case data and overall company performance.

Performance Overview

IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS has faced a total of 2 complaints. In these cases, the builder has not emerged victorious, losing both of the legal challenges brought against them. While the data regarding complaints is limited, the lack of successful outcomes raises questions about the builder's practices and customer satisfaction.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

The builder has lost 2 cases, which highlights potential issues surrounding their business practices. A closer examination of these cases reveals:

Both cases involved similar circumstances wherein the appellants withdrew their applications for recall of previous orders. This implies a possible lack of engagement from the builder to address or resolve claims effectively.
There were no counterclaims or defenses presented by the respondents, which might indicate a passive approach to resolving disputes.

These patterns suggest that IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS may struggle in managing customer relations or addressing grievances, a red flag for future buyers.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the cases won by IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS are not truly victories in the traditional sense. The outcomes primarily revolve around the appellants withdrawing their claims, leading to the dismissal of those applications:

In both instances, the final verdict indicated that the applications were dismissed as not pressed, rather than a robust defense or successful legal strategy employed by the builder.
The absence of strong legal contention or active defense work raises concerns about their engagement level and commitment to customer issues.

Conclusion

In summary, IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS (AVADI) PRIVATE LIMITED presents a perplexing case for potential home buyers. With a record of 2 complaints and no cases won in a substantive context, there are valid concerns regarding their customer relations and dispute resolution strategies.

Tips for Potential Buyers

Research Thoroughly: Conduct comprehensive research about past projects and customer reviews. Gauge the experiences of others who have purchased from IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS.
Seek Legal Guidance: If considering a purchase, it may be beneficial to consult with a legal advisor to understand your rights and potential risks associated with this builder.
Request Documentation: Always request and review the builder's past project documentation, legal history, and existing customer feedback.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder has valid licenses and a solid reputation within the industry.
Study the Track Record: Look for builders with a proven track record of successful project completion without legal disputes.
Ask for References: Don’t hesitate to ask for references from previous clients to get insights into their experiences.

While IVR PRIME DEVELOPERS may offer appealing projects, prospective buyers should tread cautiously, given the underlying patterns revealed through the legal cases. Make informed decisions to protect your investment and future satisfaction.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.

Delayed Possession Claims Recall of Orders Non-Compliance with Legal Requirements

Analysis of the cases filed against IVR Prime Developers (Avadi) Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight issues primarily surrounding delayed possession claims and the builder's attempts to recall previous orders, indicating underlying concerns with project delivery timelines.

The first type of cases involves delayed possession claims, where customers likely expressed dissatisfaction where their properties were not completed or handed over on time. Such delays often result in additional financial burdens on buyers who may be juggling rent or mortgage payments on other properties while waiting to move into their new homes.

Another recurring theme is the builder's attempts to recall orders, which suggests that there may have been misunderstandings or disputes regarding prior legal decisions. The builder's application for recall of the order dated 20.10.2020 was dismissed as not pressed, indicating a potential lack of follow-through or clarity in their legal claims.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting penalties imposed for project delays, disputing the builder's accountability for these delays, and disagreements over regulatory compliance. It appears that buyers felt necessitated to take legal action due to a perceived failure of the builder to meet contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely possession and adherence to legal standards.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with legal requirements. The lack of pressed claims during the recall application highlights a potential inadequacy in their legal preparation or a lack of substantiating evidence for their disputes. Furthermore, the absence of any claims presented by the respondents indicates that the builder may have been alone in their dissatisfaction with the legal outcomes, which could reflect a greater issue with their operational practices rather than isolated incidents.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise diligence when engaging with IVR Prime Developers. Buyers should carefully review contract terms, particularly clauses related to possession timelines and what constitutes valid reasons for extension or delay. Additionally, it is crucial to assess the builder's reputation, track record, and previous legal disputes before committing to a purchase.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number	State	Summary	Case Topic	Detailed Summary	Appellant Name	Respondent Name	Source
APPEAL-89/2019 APPEAL-89/2019	Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh	The appellant withdrew their application for reca…	["Withdrawal of app… ["Withdrawal of application"]	{"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The appellant wit…	RAHUL KUMAR RAHUL KUMAR	IVR PRIME DEVELOPER…	['https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8xNDY0MTM4OS0xOS5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy81ODc4NDg4OS0yMS5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8zMTgyNDg4OS0yMDE5LnBkZg==']