JAI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED logo

JAI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

4.5/5 (5 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Jai Infratech Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan, has been involved in several legal disputes concerning their projects. Understanding the outcomes of these cases can provide potential buyers with invaluable insights into the builder’s business practices and reliability. In this article, we will analyze Jai Infratech’s legal performance, identify patterns in their cases, and offer recommendations for prospective buyers.

Legal Performance Overview

Jai Infratech has faced a total of five complaints, of which they have won three cases and lost two. This gives the builder an overall win rate of 60% in their legal encounters. The outcomes of these cases reveal important details about the builder’s dealings with clients and how effectively they handle disputes.

Case Breakdown: Wins and Losses

  1. Cases Won by Jai Infratech (3 cases)
    • Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn: In two instances, the complaints were dismissed as the appellants sought to withdraw their appeals, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Refund Delays Communication Gaps

Analysis of the cases filed against Jai Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases highlight two primary disputes: refund delays and communication gaps.

The first type of case involves delays in refunding money to the complainants. For instance, in one case, the complainant claimed that he had not received a refund of Rs. 1,10,000/- from the builder. The builder's defense revolved around a communication gap between their Head Office and Pali Branch, which led to the failure to return the funds on time. This case illustrates a common trigger for litigation in real estate transactions, where buyers or investors often dispute delays in compensation or refunds.

The second theme emerges from the same case, emphasizing the importance of clear communication in business dealings. The builder's admission of a communication gap serves as a cautionary tale for companies to ensure proper coordination and …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Withdrawal of Appeals Refund of Deposits

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Jai Infratech Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases summarized primarily fall into two common themes: Withdrawal of Appeals and Refund of Deposits.

In the first theme, the builder sought permission to withdraw appeals that were previously made in cases regarding claims or grievances. The reasons for the appeal withdrawals often related to reassessment of the cases, where the builder opted to discontinue further litigation. In one instance, the builder voluntarily withdrew the appeal, and the court dismissed it as such, indicating a focus on resolving matters outside of court.

The second theme involves the builder's requests for refunds of deposited amounts, whereby the builder took necessary actions to recover funds that were rightfully theirs. These cases demonstrated a proactive approach by the builder in ensuring financial accountability, specifically concerning previously deposited amounts.

Upon examining the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Settlement of Disputes Claims Relating to Refunds Misrepresentations by Complainants

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Jai Infratech Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped under a few common themes that reflect the primary disputes faced by the builder. One prominent theme is 'Settlement of Disputes', where complaints were dismissed due to settlements reached between the parties involved. Additionally, 'Claims Relating to Refunds' emerged as a recurring reason for disputes, often indicating dissatisfaction on part of the complainant regarding financial transactions. Lastly, cases highlight potential 'Misrepresentations by Complainants', where claims brought forth lacked substantial evidence or were exaggerated, leading to the dismissal of complaints.

The reasons for bringing cases to court varied, including contesting penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over financial reimbursements or regulatory setbacks. These claims often stemmed from frustrations experienced by buyers concerning delivery timelines or perceived quality of service, reflecting a pattern …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review