No Logo Available

JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

4.7/5 (74 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the bustling real estate landscape of southern India, JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited has made a mark with multiple projects across Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka. However, like many builders, they have faced their share of consumer complaints and legal challenges. This blog post will delve into the builder's performance based on the legal cases filed against them, evaluating their track record in terms of complaints, wins, and losses.

Overview of JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited

JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited has recorded a total of 74 complaints filed against them, out of which they have successfully defended themselves in 55 cases, while losing 19 cases. This ratio shows a relatively strong performance, with a success rate of approximately 74% in legal disputes.

Geographic Reach

The builder operates in three southern states: Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka. Their presence in multiple states indicates …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Interest Disputes Completion of Construction and Handover Document and Approval Issues Amenities and Facilities Disputes

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Compliance with Regulatory Requirements Dispute Over Pre-deposit Obligations Erroneous Findings Claims

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited, which it lost, reveals several key insights into the nature of disputes prevalent in its operations. The cases predominantly revolve around compliance with regulatory requirements, specifically concerning pre-deposit obligations as stipulated under Section 43(5) of the Act. The builder repeatedly argued against the findings rendered by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), seeking to contest penalties imposed related to its failure to adhere to these provisions.

A recurring theme across the cases is the builder's contention that the findings by TNRERA were erroneous, indicating a pattern of disputing decisions made by regulatory bodies. This suggests a strategy where the builder may be attempting to undermine compliance requirements by framing them as unjust or unsubstantiated. Each instance involves a claim that the builder should not be obliged to make pre-deposits, which indicates a resistance to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Payment Disputes Out of Court Settlements

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited, which it won, revealed the following information.

The builder frequently faced "Delayed Possession Claims," where buyers alleged that construction was not completed, and possession of the apartments was not handed over. This type of dispute highlights significant concerns from buyers about timeliness in the real estate market. On the flip side, “Payment Disputes” emerged as another common theme, with the builder countering that buyers often failed to adhere to the agreed payment schedule. Lastly, many cases resulted in "Out of Court Settlements," indicating that parties opted to resolve their issues through a joint memorandum of compromise rather than prolonged legal battles.

The reason JAIN HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION Limited brought these disputes to court primarily revolved around contesting penalties associated with construction delays, which they attributed to various factors outside their control. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Completion and Handover Disputes Refund Claims Allegations of Non-compliance Evidence of Possession and Enjoyment of Amenities

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily fell into a few categories, reflecting common themes among the claims made by the complainants.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many complainants alleged that the builder failed to hand over possession of their apartments on time, seeking refunds for their payments. However, the builder successfully defended these claims by demonstrating that possession had been handed over, and that the complainants were enjoying the amenities of the completed projects.
  2. Completion and Handover Disputes: Several cases involved allegations that the builder did not complete the projects according to the agreed-upon specifications or failed to provide necessary approvals. The builder countered these claims by proving that the projects were completed as per agreement and that possession was granted, thus dismissing complaints about incomplete work.
  3. Refund Claims: There were multiple instances where complainants …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review