| CIN | U45201RJ2006PTC021857 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Plot No 3, Kardhani Yojana, Behind Govindam Tower Kalwar Road, Jhotwara Jaipur Jaipur RJ 302012 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Jaipur Landmark Private Limited is a prominent builder operating in Rajasthan. As with any developer, their legal history can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. This blog post aims to provide a thorough analysis of the builder's legal standing based on the complaints filed against them and the outcomes of those cases.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
Jaipur Landmark has faced a limited number of complaints, with only one documented case in which the builder was involved. The specifics of this case are crucial in understanding the builder's reliability and integrity.
Summary of Legal Case
Case Details:
- Appellant Claim: The complainant sought a refund of Rs. 48,86,400 along with interest.
- Respondent Claim: The builder claimed that the refund had been issued and that the matter was settled amicably.
- Final Verdict: The Authority ultimately disposed of the matter, directing the registrar to abort the proceedings under section 40.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Jaipur Landmark Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around refund claims related to alleged delays and dissatisfaction from complainants. The summary indicates that several of these disputes can be categorized under common themes: Refund Claims, Settlement Agreements, and Claims of Project Delays.
In these cases, complainants sought significant financial refunds citing reasons such as delayed possession and unmet expectations. These allegations were often paired with claims of interest on refunded amounts. However, the builder presented a counter-argument highlighting that refunds had been made, and many matters were amicably settled outside the courts. This suggests a potential trend where disputes arise from misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding the resolution of issues between buyers and the builder.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court typically included contesting penalties for project delays, unresolved claims for refunds, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!