| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Jalaram Developers: Legal Insights and Buyer Considerations
When navigating the real estate landscape, the reputation of a builder can often play a crucial role in the purchasing decision. One builder that has recently garnered attention is Jalaram Developers, a company operating primarily in Gujarat. This blog aims to unpack the legal context surrounding Jalaram Developers, especially focusing on the complaints filed against them, and provide potential buyers with valuable insights.
Overview of Legal Standing
Complaints and Legal Cases
Jalaram Developers has registered two complaints over time, both of which resulted in unfavorable outcomes for the builder. Here’s a brief summary of the cases:- Case One: The respondent claimed they completed their project on time; however, they failed to submit the final report, leading to a penalty of Rs. 15,000.
- Case Two: The appellant accused the builder of not submitting the final report for 'Neelkanth Residency' within …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Jalaram Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three topics: penalties for project delays, failure to submit mandatory reports, and disputes over project completion claims.
The builder faced penalties due to their inability to file final project reports within the stipulated timeframes. For instance, in the case of the 'Neelkanth Residency' project, the builder was fined Rs. 10,000 for the late submission of the final report. Similarly, another case resulted in a penalty of Rs. 15,000 for the same reason. These penalties highlight a consistent pattern where the builder neglected their regulatory obligations, leading to financial repercussions.
The disputes over project completion claims predominantly arose from the builder's assertions that they had completed projects on time, which often conflicted with the expectations of the other parties involved. The builder claimed that the society had …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!