| CIN | U74899DL1989PLC038093 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | 6,DEVIKA TOWER,UPPER GROUND FLOOR, NEHRU PLACE , DELHI, Delhi, India - 110019 |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding JMD Limited: A Comprehensive Review of Complaints and Legal Outcomes
In the world of real estate, the performance and reputation of builders can significantly impact potential buyers' investment decisions. One such builder is JMD Limited, which operates predominantly in Haryana. This blog post aims to provide a detailed analysis of JMD Limited, focusing on the complaints filed against them, their legal battles, and patterns observed in their case outcomes.
Overview of JMD Limited
JMD Limited has a concerning tally of 68 complaints filed against them, with only 9 cases won and 59 cases lost. Such statistics indicate a challenging relationship with customers and legal authorities, warranting a closer look.
Legal Case Summary
JMD Limited's legal challenges can be divided into three primary categories:
- Cases won by JMD Limited: The builder has successfully appealed in only 1 case, where they claimed to have remitted over ₹15,58,105 to the allottee. This …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, JMD Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's legal disputes can be grouped into a few primary themes that present a clearer picture of its activities in the real estate sector.
- Financial Remittance Disputes: In instances where financial transactions were challenged, JMD Limited was able to assert that it honored its commitments through timely remittances. In the reviewed case, the builder successfully demonstrated it had remitted a significant sum to the allottee, showcasing their adherence to payment agreements.
- Claims of Excess Penalties: JMD Limited contested penalties that were perceived as unjust. The builder is proactive in defending itself against claims for penalties, which often arise from project delays that are not solely attributable to its actions.
- Withdrawal of Appeals: The builder has also experienced cases where the other party, the allottee …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, JMD Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases typically fall under a few crucial themes. First, there are 'Delayed Possession Claims,' where buyers claimed that the builder did not deliver their properties on time. However, the builder frequently argued that these delays were not justified, often citing non-compliance by the buyers themselves regarding payments or other contractual obligations. Similarly, in instances of withdrawal of claims, cases were often resolved amicably, leading to a dismissal of the cases without further legal action, indicating that negotiations were successful in mitigating disputes. Additionally, some claims were dismissed due to ambiguity or lack of clarity, as noticed in cases where the complainant provided conflicting details regarding the property involved. Finally, non-appearance of complainants resulted in dismissals of their claims, highlighting the necessity for buyers to actively engage in their legal matters.
…
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!