CIN | U51909DL1999PLC100149 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 45/77, PUNJABI BAGH (W) NEW DELHI DL 110026 IN |
Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive realm of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount for ensuring a satisfactory home buying experience. Today, we delve into JOP International Limited, a builder notably engaged in the state of Haryana. This blog post examines the builder's legal confrontations, the outcomes of these cases, and offers valuable insights for potential buyers.
Overview of JOP International Limited
With a total of 16 complaints filed against them, JOP International Limited has found themselves navigating complex legal waters. To date, the builder has won only 3 cases while losing 13, indicating a troubling trend in its dealings. Analyzing the circumstances surrounding these legal matters can provide prospective buyers with a clearer picture of what to expect.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Cases Filed and Lost by JOP International Limited
The builder has encountered legal challenges that predominantly stem from the failure to comply with mandatory legal provisions outlined …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against JOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the common themes that emerged from these disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, with the majority revolving around delayed possession claims and refund disputes. Many complainants sought refunds due to the builder's failure to deliver units within the stipulated timelines, with some reporting delays of five years or more. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances and lack of payments from buyers, but the authorities did not accept this defense in most cases.
A pattern that emerged from the summaries is that people commonly brought cases to court when they felt their payments had not been honored with timely possession or when they were penalized unfairly for delays not attributed to them. There were also instances where the builder failed to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder JOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, which it lost, reveals critical insights about the recurring themes and disputes surrounding their legal challenges.
The first major category identified is "Non-compliance with Mandatory Provisions." In each case, the builder claimed a need for additional time to adhere to section 43(5) of the relevant Act. However, the respondent’s defense underscored that the builder failed to meet these mandatory legal requirements.
Another prominent theme is "Requests for Extensions on Compliance." The builder consistently sought more flexibility in adhering to legal timelines, indicating a potential struggle with regulatory timelines and procedural obligations.
The third theme, "Disputes over Regulatory Adherence," further highlights the conflict between the builder’s assurances and the respondent’s claims of insufficient compliance. The builder’s repeated requests for extensions signal challenges in fulfilling regulatory expectations, which arose in the context of meeting the statutory criteria established …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, JOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following insights regarding the nature of disputes and the outcomes of these cases.
The cases can be broadly categorized into two common themes:
- Settlement Disputes: This includes several instances where cases were resolved through mutual agreements or settlement deeds between the opposing parties. While specific details of the claims were not provided, the fact that these disputes settled indicates a willingness from both parties to find common ground, rather than prolong litigation.
- Regulatory Compliance Issues: One specific case highlighted is related to HRERA claiming that JOP International Limited had failed to comply with regulatory directions. However, this case was dismissed in favor of the builder, as they provided evidence demonstrating prior compliance through online registration.
The reasons behind these cases being brought to court often involve allegations against the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from JOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.