| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing a builder is a crucial step for prospective homebuyers. A builder’s reputation, project delivery, and legal standing can significantly influence your purchasing decision. This post focuses on Kamlashree Tower, a builder operating in Chhattisgarh, revealing their legal encounters, win-loss record, and providing essential tips for potential buyers.
Legal Standing of Kamlashree Tower
Kamlashree Tower has faced one legal complaint that resulted in a loss for the builder. The details of the case indicate that the appellant has sought a refund of Rs. 18,75,000/- paid for a flat, alongside the rights related to the non-availability of flat development tax. The issue was resolved through a mutual compromise, suggesting that while the legal process did not end in favor of the builder, both parties reached an agreement, which alleviates some of the potential reputational damage.
Complaints and Legal Cases
- Total Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Summary of Legal Case Lost
In the only case that Kamlashree Tower lost, the applicant claimed they had paid a considerable sum for a flat that did not meet expected conditions, leading to a demand for their money back. Despite the loss, the resolution via mutual compromise offers a glimmer of positivity, as it indicates that the builder was able to reach an amicable solution rather than escalating to prolonged litigation.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
The case against Kamlashree Tower reveals a pattern of dissatisfaction associated with the financial dealings between the builder and buyers. The core issue revolves around the fulfillment of contractual obligations, particularly regarding the payment versus delivery of property.
Cases Won
Kamlashree Tower does not have any cases won recorded in the data provided. This suggests that the builder may need to focus on improving customer satisfaction and contractual compliance to avoid future disputes and enhance their reputation.
Conclusion
Based on the available information, Kamlashree Tower shows a relatively concerning legal history with one lost case and no victories. This indicates potential red flags for prospective buyers regarding their reliability and fulfillment of contractual obligations. However, the resolution of the case through mutual compromise does suggest that the builder is open to negotiation, which could indicate some level of customer service commitment.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Do Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's reputation in the local market. Seek testimonials and reviews from past customers.
- Request Legal Documentation: Always ask for verifiable evidence of project delivery, approvals, and necessary documentation before making a payment.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with real estate laws and consumer rights in your state.
- Consider Third-Party Reviews: Look up online platforms or review sites to access unbiased feedback about the builder.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Their Previous Projects: Always assess the quality of previous works and whether they were completed on time.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face legal disputes and project delays.
- Pay Attention to Communication: A builder that communicates transparently about project timelines and costs is likely to keep customers informed.
- Legal Consultation: Consider hiring a real estate lawyer to help review contracts and ensure all terms are fair and transparent before signing.
Choosing a builder is a significant decision that can impact your investment. Make sure to weigh the insights provided above to guide you in making an informed choice.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Kamlashree Tower builder, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three critical areas: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, and disputes over project delivery and refunds.
The delayed possession claims largely stem from buyers contesting the builder's failure to deliver properties within the stipulated timelines. In the sole case summarized, the applicant claimed to have paid a significant amount of Rs. 18,75,000/- for a flat that was not delivered as promised, leading him to seek a refund and other rights due to the non-availability of the flat. This case highlights a pattern where buyers, after investing substantial financial resources, find themselves without the promised asset, compelling them to take legal action.
The topic of non-compliance with municipal orders is closely related to the delivery disputes, as many cases may involve builders failing to secure necessary approvals or pay required taxes, which can further delay project completions. Although the builder's defense was not provided in the case summary, it is common in such disputes for builders to argue that delays are caused by regulatory complexities or other factors beyond their control. However, when builders do not fulfill their contractual obligations, including timely delivery and compliance with regulations, it typically leads to legal consequences.
The overarching reason for the builder’s losses in these cases appears to be an inability to meet contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely project delivery and transparency in dealings with buyers. The mutual compromise in the highlighted case suggests that even when builders may not provide adequate defenses, they may still opt for settlement, which highlights the challenges they face in fulfilling buyer expectations and complying with legal standards in real estate transactions. Overall, these disputes serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers about the importance of scrutinizing builders' track records and contractual commitments before investing.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH-A20-208-0004 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, Shri Ashish Kesharwani, requested … | ["Breach of action"… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h… | Shri Ashish Kesharw… | Kamlashree Tower | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2018-00104/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_9cd8f21b-e1d2-4ea5-b5c4-635f0b8f9c7a.pdf |