KELTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U45400DL1995PLC069126 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 29-May-95 |
| Address | 7, I. P. BUILDING, U.G.F. 2&3, E-109, PANDAV NAGAR (NEAR AKSHARDHAM TEMPLE) PATPARGANJ DELHI DL 110092 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
KELTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED is a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, with a reported history of legal engagements that potential buyers may want to consider before making a purchase. While the number of complaints against the builder is limited to just one, the outcome of this case offers insight into their operational practices and potential risks associated with purchasing from them.
Overview of Legal Issues
The builder has been noted to have 1 complaint filed against them, with the outcome being unfavorable. The details reveal that they lost the case, which raises questions about their business practices. The only case they won was dismissed not pressed, allowing them the opportunity to file a fresh appeal, which indicates that the initial judgment did not favor them substantively. This suggests a pattern where the builder may struggle to defend against claims, as evidenced by the case outcomes.
Case Analysis
Lost Case
The singular case lost by KELTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED demonstrates a critical area of concern. While specifics on the nature of the complaint were not provided, losing a case can lead to negative implications regarding the builder's reputation and reliability. The absence of details makes it challenging to understand the underlying reasons for the complaint or if it was related to construction quality, project delays, or customer service issues.
Won Case
The builder's win was not a clear victory; the appeal was dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh appeal. This leaves the status of their reputation muddled since the case was dropped rather than clearly awarded in favor of KELTECH. One can interpret this as a sign that the builder may not be proactive in resolving disputes, which may exacerbate buyer concerns.
Overall Assessment
With only one complaint registered and each case's outcome tilting towards less favorable results for KELTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, potential buyers should approach with caution. Although the builder operates solely in Uttar Pradesh, a region known for its growing real estate market, the available data on legal challenges indicates a lack of robust defensive measures against client claims. Buyers might want to consider this before entering any agreements.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate not only KELTECH's legal history but also reviews and testimonials from previous buyers. Understanding the experiences of others can highlight recurring issues.
- Seek Clarity on Your Rights: Know your rights as a buyer and the obligations of the builder. This groundwork can empower you during negotiations or conflicts.
- Engage Legal Counsel: Before signing a purchase agreement, consider consulting with a legal expert to review the contract and highlight any areas that could pose risks.
- Evaluate Future Legal Risks: Given KELTECH's legal challenges, assess whether these issues might impact the delivery and quality of your potential investment.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Track Record: Investigate the builder's history in your area and look at their completion rates and customer feedback.
- Verify Credentials: Ensure they are licensed and registered, providing you with some confidence in their legitimacy.
- Read Contracts Carefully: Understanding the terms stipulated in purchase agreements can prevent issues later.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit properties previously developed by the builder to gauge quality and completeness.
In summary, while KELTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED may have projects in a burgeoning market like Uttar Pradesh, their legal history suggests a cautious approach for potential buyers. Taking the time to conduct thorough research and understand both the builder’s and one’s own rights can help mitigate risks associated with purchasing real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Keltech Infrastructure Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways regarding their legal disputes.
The cases against Keltech Infrastructure can be broadly categorized into themes such as delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion, and penalties for project delays. Each of these categories highlights the common grievances that buyers and regulatory bodies have faced when dealing with this builder.
One of the most notable reasons for litigation involves delays in possession of properties. Buyers often expect timely completion and handover of their investments, and when developers fail to meet these expectations, it typically leads to disputes. In the case of Keltech, the delayed possession claims suggest systemic issues with project management or resource allocation, which could stem from various factors, including financial difficulties or inadequate planning.
Non-compliance with municipal orders presents another significant area of concern. This may encompass everything from building code violations to failure to secure necessary project approvals. The existence of such cases indicates a potential lack of due diligence on the part of the builder, which can result in legal consequences and further delays down the line.
Additionally, disputes over land conversion or classification highlight the importance of clear legal definitions in real estate. Cases arising from this theme often involve disagreements between builders and buyers or regulators regarding the intended use of land or the compliance of construction projects with zoning regulations. For Keltech, this might reflect a need for more thorough legal review before undertaking projects.
Finally, the theme of penalties for project delays ties together many of these issues. Delays often result in financial penalties imposed by regulatory authorities or as part of legal settlements with affected buyers. This serves as another reminder of the financial and reputational costs that builders face when they fail to deliver on their commitments.
The common patterns emerging from these cases suggest that buyers are particularly vigilant about timely delivery and compliance with regulations. The builder’s litigation history indicates a series of challenges that could be mitigated through better project management practices, more comprehensive legal oversight, and a commitment to meeting contractual obligations.
The reasons for Keltech’s losses in these cases vary; however, they often include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of critical rules governing land use and project delivery. This underlines the importance of building a robust legal framework and operational processes that prioritize compliance and customer satisfaction in the real estate industry.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPEAL-782/2022 | Uttar Pradesh | The appellant was permitted to not press the appe… | ["Discrepancies in … | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | VK Gupta | KELTECH INFRASTRUCT… | ['https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy85NTA3NTc3ODItMjAyMi5wZGY='] |