Analysis of the cases filed against Kgeyes Residency Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Buyer Classification.

In the first type, Delayed Possession Claims, the complainant typically alleges that the builder has failed to complete the construction on time, resulting in mental distress and financial losses. An example of this is the claim made by the complainant who stated that the respondent delayed the construction and completion of flats.

The second type of dispute revolves around the builder's attempt to classify the complainant not as a home buyer but rather as a landowner, thereby contesting the validity of the complaint. This is evident in the builder's claim that the complainant is not a home buyer but a land owner, and thus the complaint is not maintainable.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting project delays, disputing classifications that may affect the complainant's rights, and alleging non-compliance with regulatory obligations. A pattern emerges where the builder’s litigation often stems from their attempts to redefine the relationship with the complainants or to attribute delays to other causes rather than acknowledging potential shortcomings in their operations.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to legal misclassifications and a lack of understanding of their obligations under the TNRERA. In one instance, the builder's counter claim regarding the complainant's status was not accepted, leading to an order to file a detailed counter affidavit, highlighting the inadequacies in their initial response.

In summary, Kgeyes Residency Private Limited has faced legal challenges that reflect broader issues often encountered in real estate transactions. Buyers should be wary of builders with a record of such disputes, as they may indicate operational inefficiencies or strategic attempts to evade accountability.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Kgeyes Residency Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases predominantly revolved around two main themes: 'Entitlement to Parking Spaces' and 'Maintenance Charges Disputes.' In these cases, the complainants often asserted their entitlement to car parks and sought modifications to how maintenance charges were calculated. In contrast, the builder maintained that such claims were not supported by the sale deeds and that the complaints fell outside the purview of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The reasons for bringing these cases to court included disputes over whether the complaining parties had legitimate claims to amenities like parking spaces and how maintenance charges were levied. A pattern emerged showing that buyers often felt entitled to additional benefits from the builder, leading to legal claims based on perceived oversights in their agreements.

Examining the reasons why the builder triumphed in these cases reveals several factors. In instances where the builder won, the opposing party frequently lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims. Furthermore, the builder effectively exploited the non-compliance by the complainants with existing contractual and regulatory frameworks, demonstrating that certain expectations were unfounded as they had not been articulated in the sale deed. This signifies a recurring trend where misunderstandings about land and project classifications led to exaggerated claims from buyers.

This analysis provides meaningful insights into the builder's reputation and reflects on the broader real estate market. It highlights that, sometimes, buyers may launch false accusations against builders, resulting in unnecessary legal confrontations. Kgeyes Residency Private Limited’s strong track record of successfully defending against unjust claims speaks well of their reputation in the market.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions. While legitimate disputes exist within the real estate sector, the analysis of these cases illustrates that builders like Kgeyes Residency Private Limited can effectively defend themselves against unfounded allegations. Therefore, buyers should approach claims with caution and seek trustworthy information to form accurate assessments of a builder's standing.