CIN | U70101RJ2011PTC034654 |
---|---|
Year Established | 25-Mar-11 |
Address | C/O RAJENDRA PETROL SERVICE OPPOSITE RAILWAY STATION, POST NOKHA BIKANER RJ 334803 IN |
Company Status | Private |
When considering a builder for your next project, it's vital to analyze their track record and how they handle legal matters. In this post, we take a closer look at Khakhi Baba Buildcon Private Limited, a builder with a project presence in Rajasthan, examining their legal history and offering insights for potential buyers.
Khakhi Baba Buildcon Private Limited currently has one recorded complaint against them. They have lost one case in which the legal authority found them guilty of not filing an application for the extension of validity of their registration on time. The imposed penalty was Rs. 15,000, which suggests a somewhat lackadaisical approach to compliance with regulatory requirements.
The legal case highlights a significant issue:
In contrast, Khakhi Baba Buildcon has not won any cases, revealing a concerning trend in their legal affairs.
Given the available data, Khakhi Baba Buildcon Private Limited appears to have significant areas for improvement, particularly concerning compliance with regulatory deadlines. The penalty imposed in their lost case might raise red flags for potential buyers regarding their reliability and adherence to industry standards.
By considering these insights and recommendations, potential buyers can make more informed decisions when contemplating a purchase from Khakhi Baba Buildcon Private Limited or any builder in general.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Khakhi Baba Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in three primary areas: regulatory non-compliance, penalties for project delays, and disputes over the validity of registrations.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, stands out in the case where the Authority claimed that the promoter failed to file an application for the extension of validity of their registration before the expiry date. This indicates a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which likely contributed to the builder's legal challenges.
The second theme, penalties for project delays, is closely linked to the first. Delays often arise from non-compliance with legal requirements or from misunderstandings regarding project timelines and classifications. In the case summarized, the penalty imposed for late registration extension reflects the builder's recurrent issues with meeting regulatory deadlines, which would likely lead to project delays, frustrating buyers and prompting legal disputes.
The third theme, disputes over registration validity, encapsulates the builder’s difficulties with maintaining valid registrations for their projects. This is critical in the real estate sector, as it determines the builder's legitimacy and ability to operate. The builder's defense—that they intended to submit an application for extension—illustrates a reactive rather than proactive approach to compliance, which is a common trait among builders facing legal challenges.
People commonly bring cases against builders like Khakhi Baba Buildcon for several reasons: contesting penalties that they feel are unjust, disputing delays in project completion that are often attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification or registration requirements. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that builders tend to face litigation due to insufficient evidence of compliance, failure to adhere to regulatory timelines, and a lack of clarity regarding their obligations.
Ultimately, the builder's losses in these cases point to a systemic issue with their operational practices. Factors such as insufficient documentation, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a general lack of transparency in dealings contribute to the common outcomes of these disputes. Buyers considering projects by Khakhi Baba Buildcon should take these legal challenges into account when making their investment decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F ३ (339)RJ/RERAPI2… | Rajasthan | The Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority im… | ["Violation of Real… | {"appellant_claim": "The Authority claimed that t… | Suo Moto through Re… | Khakhi Baba Buildco… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/55433(339).pdf |