Analysis of the cases filed against Kirti Builders and Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around a few common themes, highlighting systemic issues within the builder's operations, particularly concerning compliance and communication.

The predominant theme among the cases involves the Failure to Submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on time. This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with regulatory requirements, specifically those mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder faced multiple claims from appellants stating that QPRs were not submitted to the RERA web portal, which led to penalties and threats of registration revocation. The builder consistently claimed to have submitted the reports, often attributing the discrepancy to technical issues rather than negligence or non-compliance.

Penalties for Non-Compliance and Project Delays constitute another critical theme. As the builder failed to meet the required deadlines for QPR submissions, they incurred penalties and delay processing charges. This points to an emerging pattern where the builder's inability to fulfill regulatory obligations not only jeopardized their legal standing but also imposed additional financial burdens.

Technical Issues and Upload Disputes are frequently cited by the builder as a defense against the claims made by appellants. While it’s essential to acknowledge that technical problems can arise, the sheer volume of cases attributing non-compliance to such issues raises concerns about the builder's IT infrastructure and their proficiency in navigating the RERA web portal.

Lastly, the Revocation of Registration Threats showcases the severe repercussions the builder faced due to repeated non-compliance. The authority's willingness to consider revocation highlights the significant risks associated with non-fulfillment of legal obligations in the real estate sector.

In conclusion, the builder's losses in these cases stem from a combination of insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance, a lack of understanding of their obligations under the RERA, and an inability to effectively address technical issues. As a real estate consultancy expert, it is crucial to advise potential buyers to exercise caution when considering properties developed by Kirti Builders and Developers, given the troubling patterns of non-compliance and legal disputes evident in these cases.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Kirti Builders and Developers, which the builder won, revealed a pattern of recurring disputes primarily centered around non-compliance with regulatory reporting requirements, particularly regarding Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs).

The cases can be broadly categorized under themes such as 'Non-compliance with Regulatory Reporting,' where appellants claimed that QPRs were not submitted on time or at all. In these instances, the builder often defended itself by asserting that the reports had been submitted but either were not uploaded due to technical issues or were contested by the appellants with insufficient supporting evidence.

Another recurrent theme is 'Penalties for Delayed Reporting.' Many cases discussed the implications of delays in submission and the resulting financial penalties imposed on the builder. Appellants in these cases cited potential revocation of registration against the builder; however, Kirti Builders and Developers frequently countered that they had adhered to reporting timelines or had valid reasons for the delays.

Additionally, the analysis highlighted a number of disputes related to 'Claims of Misrepresentation' and 'Technical Issues Affecting Compliance.' In several instances, the builder claimed that QPRs had been submitted but not reflected appropriately on the regulatory web portal, a defense rooted in technical difficulties outside the builder's control.

Common reasons for the initiation of these disputes by buyers or regulatory bodies included contesting penalties and allegations of project delays. The overwhelming theme points to misunderstandings or lack of clear communication regarding submission processes or the regulatory framework within which Kirti Builders operates.

The builder's successful defense often hinged on several critical factors: a demonstrated lack of sufficient evidence from the opposing parties, adherence to legal and regulatory obligations, and the ability to produce acceptable justifications for any noted issues, such as technical difficulties. This ability to adequately respond to complaints illustrates that sometimes accusations from buyers can be unfounded or based on misunderstandings, rather than legitimate grievances.

This analysis suggests that Kirti Builders and Developers has maintained a robust reputation in the real estate market, effectively countering unjust allegations. However, it also underscores the caution potential buyers must exercise. While some disputes in the real estate market are founded on legitimate concerns, the data indicates that builders can sometimes face legal actions over exaggerated claims.

Therefore, potential buyers are advised to engage in thorough due diligence before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. Understanding the complexity of disputes and the context behind them ensures that buyers can make informed decisions, avoiding the pitfalls of rushed judgments based on incomplete or biased information.