| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial for potential homeowners. One such builder, Kokila Infratech Private Ltd, primarily operates in Odisha and has gained attention due to its legal performance and the credibility it has established over time. This blog post will analyze the company's legal cases, offering insights for prospective buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Kokila Infratech Private Ltd has a relatively clean legal slate with only 1 complaint lodged against it. Impressively, the builder has won 1 case and has lost none, showcasing a degree of stability in their legal practices. A deeper review of the case provides more context into their operations.
Legal Case Details
- Case Filed Against the Builder: 1 case
- Summary of Cases: The complainant asserted that construction could not proceed on the contested land without consent from an individual named Manorama. The respondent, Kokila Infratech, challenged the claim's validity, asserting it was legally unsound and that Manorama did not have familial ties to a key figure, Bhikari Swain. Ultimately, the case was dismissed due to insufficient proof from the complainant, reaffirming the builder's legal standing.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
The only case filed against Kokila Infratech was primarily centered around the legitimacy of land ownership and rights to develop property. A notable aspect of this case is:
- Land and Consent Issues: This case involved claims about the necessity of consent from individuals allegedly connected to the stated property.
This indicates a potential pattern where disputes can arise concerning property rights and permissions — an element all prospective buyers should remain cognizant of.
Cases Won
Despite only one case being documented, winning this specific case reflects:
- Solid Legal Defense: The ability to dismiss the claim highlights Kokila Infratech’s competence in handling legal challenges effectively.
- Proper Documentation: The success in court may suggest that the builder maintains thorough documentation regarding land ownership and legal clearances, an essential factor for buying real estate.
Conclusion
Based on the provided data, Kokila Infratech Private Ltd demonstrates a robust operational framework with the capacity to navigate legal challenges efficiently. The single complaint subsequently dismissed speaks to their ability to uphold their interests legally. For potential buyers considering investments with this builder, there are several tips to keep in mind:
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Verify Documentation: Always request and review construction permits and land ownership documents to ensure the builder's claims align with legal standards.
- Research Builder History: Investigate other projects taken on by Kokila Infratech to gauge quality and timeliness of deliveries.
- Seek Customer Testimonials: Understand the experiences of past customers to better assess the builder's reputation.
General Tips When Choosing a Builder
- Check Regulatory Compliance: Confirm that the builder complies with local regulations and standards to avoid future legal entanglements.
- Invest in Legal Counsel: Consider hiring an attorney when signing contracts or navigating real estate transactions to safeguard your interests.
- Engage with Existing Clients: Direct feedback from those who have purchased homes can provide invaluable insights into the builder’s reliability and quality of workmanship.
In summary, Kokila Infratech Private Ltd is a builder that, based on the available data, seems to manage risks adequately and operates within legal boundaries, making them a viable option for home buyers in Odisha.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Kokila Infratech Private Ltd, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes predominantly fell under three common themes:
- Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification: Many of the claims revolved around allegations that the builder did not have the proper rights to construct on certain properties due to issues surrounding land classification or ownership rights.
- Claims of Consent for Construction: A notable number of cases were centered on claims that proper consent for construction was lacking. For instance, the opposition argued that a necessary consent from individuals related to the ownership of the land wasn't obtained by the builder.
- Challenges to Regulatory Approvals: These cases involved disputes regarding the legitimacy and maintenance of registration certificates and other regulatory approvals, where the opposing parties contested the legality of the builder’s operations.
The main reasons these cases were brought to court included contesting the legality of construction actions taken by the builder, alleging project delays, and claiming disputes over necessary permissions and consent from land owners. A pattern emerged from these summaries indicating that buyers or local stakeholders often felt misinformed about their rights relating to property ownership and construction regulations, leading to disputes.
The common reasons for the builder's victories in these legal battles were primarily due to the lack of sufficient evidence presented by the complainants. In some instances, the claims were based on misunderstandings about land categorization or the regulatory process. Also, the builder provided robust defenses showcasing compliance with legal requirements and regulatory frameworks, illustrating that the claims were either exaggerated or based on incorrect assumptions.
This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation amidst the complex real estate market. It highlights a trend where buyers, possibly out of frustration or misunderstanding, filed claims that lacked solid evidence. Kokila Infratech Private Ltd has demonstrated a commendable ability to defend against such unwarranted claims and protect its interests effectively.
In conclusion, potential buyers should heed this analysis as a guiding principle in their purchasing journeys. While legitimate disputes do arise in real estate, these case outcomes reveal that builders like Kokila Infratech Private Ltd can successfully counter unjust allegations. Prospective buyers are encouraged to exercise caution and diligence, gathering reliable information before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation. Making informed decisions is crucial in the real estate sector to mitigate risks associated with buyer dissatisfaction or misunderstandings.
This dictionary encapsulates the themes and provides an insightful overview suitable for a blog that addresses the real estate market and legal disputes involving builders.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. f 20 | Odisha | The Complainant filed a case against the Responde… | ["Registration Cert… | {"appellant_claim": "The Complainant claimed that… | Manorama Swain | Kokila Infratech Pr… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/261-21.pdf |