KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Understanding KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED: A Dive into Their Legal Journey

Introduction

KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED is a prominent builder in the real estate sector, especially recognized in states like Maharashtra and Karnataka. However, like many builders, they have navigated a path filled with legal challenges, which can provide valuable insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Disputes

KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED has faced a total of 58 complaints, with outcomes split between 23 cases won and 35 cases lost. This imbalance highlights a noteworthy trend in the builder's legal landscape and necessitates a closer examination.

Patterns in Cases Lost

Common Factors

1. Compensation Claims: A significant number of the cases lost by Kolte Patil involved claims for delay compensation, particularly in their high-profile 'MIRABILIS' project. Complainants frequently cited delays in possession and completion dates as primary reasons for seeking compensation, suggesting that this builder has struggled with …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Kolte Patil Developers Limited, which it lost, reveals a multitude of challenges faced by the builder in fulfilling its commitments to customers. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, each highlighting a significant area of dispute.

The most recurring theme is Delayed Possession Claims. In numerous instances, plaintiffs sought compensation for the builder's failure to deliver possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timeframes. This points to an apparent systemic issue within the builder's project management capabilities, resulting in repeated failures to meet contractual obligations.

Another common theme is Compensation for Mental Agony and Delay. Here, complainants sought damages for the emotional distress and financial hardships caused by the delays. The builder's inability to provide timely possession led to multiple lawsuits seeking various amounts of compensation, indicating a lack of adequate customer care during prolonged wait periods.

Disputes over Sale …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be broadly grouped under two primary themes: 'Delay Compensation Disputes' and 'Adjudicating Officer Jurisdiction Challenges'.

1. Delay Compensation Disputes: Several cases centered around the builder’s claim that the delay compensation rate of 10.25% was excessive, suggesting a disagreement over contractual terms related to project delays. The builder contended that the compensation sought was not aligned with the agreement and often coincided with the provision of electrification, which was a point of contention with respondents.
2. Adjudicating Officer Jurisdiction Challenges: Numerous instances involved questions regarding whether the Adjudicating Officer had the jurisdiction to decide on matters beyond mere compensation. In these cases, the builder argued that the jurisdiction was exceeded, opposing the claims from respondents who believed the compensation awarded was appropriate.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

Several recurring themes were identified in the disputes, primarily centering around delayed compensation claims and refunds. The majority of cases involved buyers seeking compensation for delays related to specific projects, particularly the 'MIRABILIS' project. Additionally, some cases involved claims for refunds of amounts such as booking fees or property taxes.

In many instances, the plaintiffs claimed compensation or refunds based on perceived delays in possession or project completion. For example, there were multiple cases focused on compensation for delays in the 'MIRABILIS' project, indicating that this may be a common concern among buyers. Other cases involved plaintiffs withdrawing their claims after reaching settlements or failing to appear, highlighting a potential trend where buyers may overreach in their claims without substantial backing.

The builder successfully won …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis