| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate landscape of Maharashtra, Krishna Developers Private Limited stands out as a prominent builder with a mixed record in legal challenges. With a total of 10 complaints filed against them, the company has managed to win 8 of these cases while losing 2. This blog delves into the legal intricacies surrounding Krishna Developers, highlighting patterns in their cases, and offering valuable advice for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Krishna Developers has been involved in a series of legal maneuvers that reflect both their strengths and areas where they have faced challenges. Analyzing their case history provides insight into the company's reliability and operational practices.
Cases Won by Krishna Developers
The builder has successfully navigated 6 cases where they filed and won. The common themes among these victories include:
- Withdrawal of Appeals: Several cases involved the appellant seeking to withdraw their appeals, with the respondents …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Krishna Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be grouped into two primary themes: non-compliance with judgment decrees and coercive actions resulting from settlement delays.
The first theme, non-compliance with judgment decrees, encompasses the recurring issue seen in these cases where the builder was found to have not adhered to previous legal rulings. This suggests a systemic problem within the company's operations, as repeated failures to comply with judicial outcomes could indicate a lack of effective governance or adherence to legal standards.
The second theme, coercive actions for settlement delays, highlights the tribunal's response to the builder's lack of compliance. By ordering coercive actions, the tribunal sends a clear message to the builder about the importance of fulfilling legal obligations, especially concerning prior settlements. This theme underlines the risks builders face when they …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Krishna Developers Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following insights into its legal encounters and outcomes. The cases can be grouped into several common themes, including the 'Withdrawal of Appeals', 'Delay in Proceedings', 'Non-objection from Opposing Parties', and 'Review Applications'.
Firstly, the cases pertaining to 'Withdrawal of Appeals' highlight instances where the builder sought permission to withdraw certain appeals, and in every case, the opposing party had no objection. This suggests an amicable or unchallenged resolution for the builder, steeped in understanding between the parties involved that speaks to the overall levels of cooperation and possibly, prior negotiations.
Secondly, the themes surrounding 'Delay in Proceedings' come into play when discussing how the builder's claims about reliance on others for tribunal orders were met with little resistance from the opposing side. This raises questions about the efficiency of the processes involved …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Krishna Developers Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around the enforcement of Tribunal orders and ongoing procedures related to deed cancellations. In these cases, appellants claimed that the Tribunal's orders needed to be stayed due to orders issued by the High Court, highlighting an area of contention regarding the legal standing of decisions made by lower tribunals in light of higher court directives. The builder's defense centered around the assertion that these matters are still within the deed of cancellation process, thereby upholding the validity of the Tribunal's decisions until those processes are officially concluded. A recurring theme in the analyses of these disputes is the challenge buyers face when attempting to contest or delay proceedings based on legal interpretations or procedural nuances.
The reasons plaintiffs brought these cases to court often revolved …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!