
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing a builder is a critical decision that can significantly impact your experience as a homebuyer. This blog post takes an in-depth look at Landmark Associates, a builder based in Chhattisgarh, and analyzes their performance based on legal complaints and outcomes. With a total of 97 recorded complaints, the conclusions drawn here may be crucial for potential buyers considering a project with this builder.
Overview of Landmark Associates
Landmark Associates has a concerning record when it comes to customer satisfaction, with 97 complaints lodged against them. Out of these, they have managed to win only 1 case, while losing a staggering 96 cases. This statistic raises red flags regarding their reliability and capacity to fulfill their obligations to clients.
Legal Case Analysis
Common Patterns in Cases Lost by Landmark Associates
A detailed review of the lost cases reveals several patterns:
- Maintenance Charges Disputes …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Landmark Associates, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the common themes that emerged from the disputes. The cases could be broadly categorized into four topics: delayed possession claims, facilities not developed as per the brochure and agreement, deficiencies in construction, and jurisdiction and compensation disputes.
The majority of the cases centered around the builder's failure to develop facilities in accordance with the promises made in the brochures and agreements. Homebuyers claimed that the flats and projects were not constructed as per the specifications, leading to multiple rulings by the Authority that the builder must complete the development work within a stipulated time frame. This highlights a pattern of neglect in adhering to contractual obligations, a factor that repeatedly triggered litigation.
Delayed possession of flats was another recurring theme. Buyers claimed that the builder had delayed possession, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Landmark Associates, in which it lost, reveals several significant insights regarding the disputes and challenges faced by the company.
- Maintenance Charges Disputes:
A considerable number of the cases revolve around maintenance charges that the builder claimed were unpaid by the respondents. The amounts varied, with some claims reaching as high as Rs. 24,600. The respondents typically contested these claims by asserting that they had not received possession of their flats or that the builder had not provided the necessary services and amenities as promised. This category of dispute highlights a prevalent concern from property buyers regarding maintenance fee transparency and obligation, especially in the context of inadequate service delivery.
- Disputes Regarding Services and Facilities:
Several cases indicated that the respondents claimed deficiencies in the services or facilities provided by the builder. They asserted that without proper …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Landmark Associates, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases examined primarily revolved around three key themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Project Schedule, and Disputes Regarding Registration Delays.
Under the theme of Delayed Possession Claims, complaints were raised by applicants regarding the timely possession of their flats. These claims often stemmed from perceptions of delays in moving into newly constructed properties, leading to discontent among buyers.
The Non-compliance with Project Schedule theme addresses disputes relating to the execution of construction projects as per the agreed timelines. In the summarized case, disputes arose specifically from claims about registration delays as outlined in promotional materials, wherein buyers contested the builder's adherence to conditions.
Furthermore, the Disputes Regarding Registration Delays reflect the frustrations of buyers concerning the formalities involved in property registration. Buyers filed complaints when they believed registration processes were …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from LANDMARK ASSOCIATES?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.