| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to construction and real estate, choosing the right builder is a crucial decision that can affect your investment and peace of mind. In this blog post, we will examine LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION, a builder operating in Tamil Nadu, and evaluate its performance based on customer complaints and legal outcomes.
Overview of LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION
LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION has registered one official complaint, resulting in one legal case that ended with the builder on the losing side. This limited but significant data provides insight into the builder's practices and customer satisfaction.
Legal Case Details
The legal case involved complaints from a customer, where the appellant claimed that the builder failed to complete the construction of their apartments according to the agreement. They specifically highlighted the lack of promised amenities, including automatic lifts and a 100% generator backup system.
In response, the builder argued that the project did not fall under the ongoing projects category as per the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) guidelines and asserted that the complainant was given possession prior to RERA's implementation. The resolution mandated that the builder complete the installation of the generator backup, secure a completion certificate from the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), and provide the original documents of the property to the buyer.
Analysis of Complaints
Patterns in Cases Lost
In the case that the builder lost, the primary issue revolved around unfulfilled commitments regarding construction completion and promised amenities. The clear takeaway here is that issues of unfinished work and unprovided facilities may arise, signaling potential risks for buyers regarding timely delivery and quality assurance.
Patterns in Cases Won
Although the builder has technically not won any cases, it's essential to note that they have successfully defended their stance concerning the classification of their projects under RERA regulations. Such defenses suggest that buyers should be aware of laws and regulations applicable to their transactions and verify the builder's compliance in these areas.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION may present some risks for potential buyers, particularly concerning adherence to project timelines and fulfillment of promised amenities. The lone complaint and subsequent legal loss highlight the importance of due diligence when considering this builder for new properties.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s previous projects and any complaints filed against them.
- Ask for Documentation: Ensure that all legal paperwork, including possession certificates and completion certificates, are in order before finalizing any agreements.
- Verify Amenities: Confirm what amenities are included in the agreement and check for their implementation in existing projects.
- Understand RERA Guidelines: Familiarize yourself with RERA provisions to better understand your rights as a buyer.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check for Reviews: Look for online reviews, testimonials, and ratings from past clients.
- Assess Transparency: A good builder should be open about their processes, pricing, and timelines.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: Ensure the builder has a solid financial background, reducing the risk of project delays due to funding issues.
- Engage a Legal Expert: Before signing any contract, consult with a legal expert specializing in real estate to protect your interests.
In conclusion, while LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION operates within Tamil Nadu, potential buyers should approach with caution and conduct thorough research to mitigate risks associated with purchasing a property from them.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Landmark Construction that it lost reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: Incomplete Construction and Amenities Disputes, and Regulatory Compliance and Project Classification.
The first type of dispute often revolves around the builder's failure to deliver promised amenities or complete projects in accordance with the initial agreements. For instance, in one significant case, the complainant asserted that Landmark Construction did not provide required amenities such as automatic lifts and 100% generator backup in the apartments. This indicates a pattern where buyers may feel cheated out of their expectations, leading them to seek legal recourse.
The second theme involves regulatory compliance and the builder's classification of projects. In the case mentioned, Landmark Construction contested the applicability of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) by claiming that the project did not qualify as an ongoing project at the time of its implementation. However, the authority ruled against the builder, emphasizing the need for adherence to regulatory standards and project classifications that align with legal frameworks.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the quality of construction, disputing the builder's compliance with regulatory requirements, and disagreements over promised versus delivered amenities. Buyers were often triggered to take legal action when they felt that significant aspects of their purchase agreements were not met, particularly concerning essential amenities that affect the livability and value of properties.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a combination of factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance, failure to follow regulatory guidelines, and a lack of transparency regarding the scope of promised amenities contributed to the legal outcomes. Furthermore, the builder's misunderstanding or misclassification of projects under RERA resulted in legal consequences, highlighting the importance of legal compliance in real estate ventures.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.No.152/2022 | Tamil Nadu | The complainant sought relief against the respond… | ["Real Estate Dispu… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Thiru T.G. Parthasa… | Land Mark Construct… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2022/152-2022.pdf |