| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of real estate, it's essential for potential buyers to conduct thorough research on builders before making a purchase. This blog post delves into LANDMARK DEVELOPERS, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh, to assess its reputation based on legal complaints and case outcomes.
Overview of LANDMARK DEVELOPERS
- Name: LANDMARK DEVELOPERS
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
- States with Projects: Madhya Pradesh
Legal Case Details
Overview of the Case
The single legal case brought against LANDMARK DEVELOPERS provides an insight into the builder's dealings with clients.
- Complaint Summary:
- Appellant Claim: The applicant claimed a delay in possession despite paying the booking amount and sought compensation.
- Respondent Claim: The builder countered that the appellant paid only 4% of the total amount (the booking fee) and had not followed up with further payments, thereby asserting that construction was completed on time.
- Final Verdict: The Authority instructed the applicant to pay the balance amount within 30 days while offering possession of the building. It was noted that failure to respond within 7 days would imply a cancellation of the booking request.
Case Analysis
Cases Lost by LANDMARK DEVELOPERS
In the only case filed against LANDMARK DEVELOPERS, the builder lost. The outcome reveals a pattern concerning customer expectations versus the builder's claims. The applicant expected timely possession based on the initial payment, while the builder indicated a lack of further payment as critical in their response. This highlights a potential mismatch in understanding payment schedules and possession timelines.
Cases Won by LANDMARK DEVELOPERS
As the builder has not won any legal cases, it indicates challenges in maintaining favorable resolutions pertaining to legal disputes. The singular case suggests that if buyers fail to complete subsequent payments, they risk complications and potential loss in recourse should disputes arise over timelines or possession.
Conclusion
Based on the limited data available, LANDMARK DEVELOPERS presents some red flags for potential buyers. The solitary legal case indicates a possible lack of customer satisfaction or communication regarding payment obligations.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Understand Payment Structures: Always clarify the payment timeline and responsibilities.
- Seek Feedback from Other Buyers: Investigate customer experiences and online reviews for more insight.
- Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all agreements are documented to avoid any future discrepancies.
General Tips When Selecting a Builder
- Research Builder History: Look for reviews and past performance, especially regarding how they resolve complaints.
- Check for Complaints: Investigate any legal disputes or complaints involving the builder.
- Visit Past Projects: If possible, tour completed projects to assess quality first-hand.
Overall, while LANDMARK DEVELOPERS operates in Madhya Pradesh, potential buyers should proceed with caution and do their diligence before committing to any investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Landmark Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily revolve around two main topics: delayed possession claims and insufficient payment disputes.
The delayed possession claims involve situations where buyers allege that the builder failed to provide possession of their properties on time. In one notable case, the applicant claimed that despite paying the booking amount, possession had not been granted, leading him to seek compensation for the delay. However, the builder's defense highlighted that the applicant had only paid 4% of the total amount, which indicates a broader issue of buyers not fulfilling their payment obligations.
Insufficient payment disputes emerge as a significant theme, as seen in the aforementioned case where the builder emphasized the applicant's failure to pay installments beyond the initial booking amount. This raises a crucial point: many disputes in real estate transactions stem from misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding payment requirements and timelines.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting delays, disputing payment requirements, and disagreements over contractual obligations. Buyers often find themselves at odds with builders when they feel their payments should entitle them to timely possession or when they contest the builder's claims of delayed payments. The builder’s litigation history suggests a pattern where buyers underpay or fail to continue payments, which can understandably create tension and lead to disputes.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, primarily revolving around their handling of buyer payments and possession timelines. In the case outlined, the builder's victory was contingent upon the applicant's lack of further payments, which highlights the need for clear communication and adherence to payment schedules established in sales agreements. Furthermore, builders must ensure compliance with regulatory requirements governing possession timelines and buyer rights to avoid legal repercussions.
In conclusion, the cases against Landmark Developers reflect broader issues in the real estate sector concerning payment disputes and delayed possession claims. Buyers and builders should take heed of these patterns, ensuring open communication and adherence to contractual obligations to mitigate the risk of litigation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-8? .-8-0964 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Shri Pankaj Bajpai, booked a prope… | ["Property Dispute"… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h… | Shri Pankaj Bajpai | Landmark Developers | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/665611113183.pdf |