LAVISH BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, understanding a builder's track record can significantly influence buyer confidence. This post aims to provide a detailed overview of LAVISH BUILDMART Private Limited, focusing on their legal history regarding complaints and court cases. Based in Haryana, we will analyze their performance in resolving disputes, offering insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

LAVISH BUILDMART Private Limited has been involved in 3 complaints, winning 2 cases and losing 1. The following is a breakdown of the legal scenarios:

Cases Won

1. Case Summary:
   The complainant alleged that the builder failed to complete the project per the agreement and did not allow possession of the unit. The builder contended that the project was incomplete, leading to the possession issue. The final verdict mandated the builder to facilitate possession of the unit within 2 months and to clear any outstanding payments.
   Analysis of Win:
   - …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Lavish Buildmart Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, disputes over land conversion or classification, project delay penalties, and regulatory non-compliance.

Many of the cases appear to stem from delays in delivering units to buyers, leading to claims of delayed possession. Buyers often contest penalties imposed for these delays, arguing that the builder failed to provide timely notice or that the delays were caused by factors beyond their control. This highlights a significant area of concern, as timely communication and adherence to project timelines are crucial in maintaining buyer trust.

Additionally, several cases revolve around disputes related to land classification or conversion. Buyers may disagree with the builder's interpretation of regulatory frameworks regarding land use, which can lead to legal challenges. This emphasizes the importance of thorough legal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, LAVISH BUILDMART Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Completion of Project requirements, and Disputes Over Outstanding Dues.

Within the theme of Delayed Possession Claims, the builder often found itself in litigation stemming from complaints about supposed failures to provide units on time or complete projects per agreements. In contrast, disputes over Completion of Project requirements typically involved allegations against the builder about not meeting contractual obligations, often leading to claims of negligence or failures. Lastly, the Disputes Over Outstanding Dues category highlighted recurring conflicts where respondents refused to settle accounts, citing non-completion as their defense while the builder sought rightful payments for the services rendered.

The builder frequently brought cases to court to contest penalties or to refute claims regarding delays that were often attributed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, LAVISH BUILDMART Private Limited, which resulted in victories for the builder, revealed several key insights into the nature of complaints and the builder's defense mechanisms.

The cases tended to revolve around a few recurring themes. The first notable category is Settlement Agreements, where disputes were often resolved amicably outside the courtroom, as seen in the case involving Ramesh Chand Bansal. This pattern indicates a strong inclination toward resolving issues through mutual consent rather than prolonged litigation.

Buyers or opposing parties generally brought these cases to court due to claims such as delays in project completion and disputes over the fulfillment of contractual obligations. Specifically, claims of Delayed Possession were significant, as buyers expected adherence to stipulated timelines upon purchase.

One of the compelling reasons the builder won …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis