LIVE IN INFRACON

Introduction

When selecting a builder for your next property venture, it’s crucial to analyze their performance and reputation. In this blog, we will take a closer look at LIVE IN INFRACON, a builder operating in Telangana, examining their complaint record, legal cases, and what potential buyers should keep in mind.

Overview of LIVE IN INFRACON

• Name: LIVE IN INFRACON
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0
• States with Projects: Telangana

Legal Case Details

LIVE IN INFRACON faced one legal case filed against them by a complainant association. While the builder claimed to have met the Complainant Association's expectations, the issues raised included the installation of a dummy fire extinguisher, inadequate greenery on the property, and an insufficient lift for the number of flats. The final verdict indicated that the authority found the works on the matter adequately completed, resulting in the case being disposed of in favor of the builder.

Analysis of Complaint Patterns

• Cases Lost:

Based on the legal case details provided, the complaint filed against the builder revolved around specific issues of compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The complainants cited safety concerns due to the fire extinguisher, environmental concerns regarding greenery, and functionality issues tied to the lift size.

• Cases Won:

LIVE IN INFRACON won the legal case based on their claim that they completed the works as required. The authority's ruling highlights that compliance with regulations can hinge significantly on adequate support and documentation from the builder, indicating that their preparedness helped them avoid any liability despite the complaints raised.

Conclusion: Assessing LIVE IN INFRACON

Overall, LIVE IN INFRACON has a commendable record with only one complaint, and they successfully defended their position in that case. This indicates that they are potentially proactive in managing projects and resolving disputes. However, the nature of the complaint should raise a flag regarding the importance of regulatory compliance and attention to detail in project execution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Thorough Research: Look into the past projects of LIVE IN INFRACON, assessing whether they align with your expectations in terms of quality and adherence to regulations.
2. Engagement with Existing Residents: If possible, engage with current residents in projects built by LIVE IN INFRACON to gather insight into their on-ground experience.
3. Documentation Verification: Ensure that all documents concerning the property and compliance with local laws are in order before making a purchase.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Reviews and Ratings: Online reviews and ratings can provide valuable insights into the builder's reputation and project quality.
2. Confirm Credentials: Assess the builder's credentials, including registration with relevant regulatory bodies, to confirm their legitimacy and reliability.
3. Understand Warranty and Service: Clarify the warranty and post-purchase service offered by the builder to ensure you have support after acquisition.

In conclusion, while LIVE IN INFRACON shows promise, potential buyers should conduct thorough due diligence to ensure a satisfying and safe investment in their upcoming projects.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, LIVE IN INFRACON, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The cases against the builder primarily revolve around three common themes: Regulatory Compliance Issues, Quality and Safety Concerns, and Disputes over Project Deliverables. Each category encapsulates various complaints filed by buyers or complainant associations.

Regulatory Compliance Issues reflect disputes where the builder was accused of failing to meet statutory obligations, such as those outlined in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In the analyzed case, there were allegations concerning the installation of an inadequate safety mechanism (a dummy fire extinguisher), which could potentially jeopardize resident safety.

Quality and Safety Concerns also emerged in these cases, highlighting issues related to residential amenities, such as insufficient greenery and inadequate lift capacity. These complaints suggest that buyers expected higher standards of living and safety provisions, which they believed were not met by the builder.

Disputes over Project Deliverables often manifest in claims regarding project execution and compliance with initial expectations set during sale agreements. The contested claims included arguments that the builder did not fulfill the promises related to the quality and functionality of features included in the residential project.

The reasons behind bringing these cases to court typically involve contesting penalties, delays in project delivery, and disagreements over quality specifications or compliance with regulations. A notable pattern observed in these cases is the tendency of buyers or associations to file complaints based on perceived discrepancies between expectations and deliverables.

In terms of defending against these claims, the builder successfully established that they completed the works as requested by the Complainant Association and provided justifiable reasons for each of the allegations. Often, the opposing parties lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or failed to comply with legal or procedural requirements necessary for a robust case.

This analysis provides valuable insight into the builder’s reputation and highlights a broader context within the real estate market. It indicates that while there are certainly legitimate concerns that arise, there is also a potential for buyers to make exaggerated claims. The ability of LIVE IN INFRACON to defend itself effectively against such allegations suggests a solid operational framework in place, as well as adherence to industry standards.

For potential buyers, this serves as a reminder of the importance of making informed decisions in the real estate market. While some builders may indeed have shortcomings, the analysis of these cases demonstrates that builders like LIVE IN INFRACON can often vindicate themselves against inflated claims. Therefore, buyers are advised to carefully evaluate any allegations and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.

This dictionary encapsulates both the thematic analysis of the cases and a detailed narrative reflecting the intricacies of the legal encounters faced by the builder LIVE IN INFRACON.