No Logo Available

LUCINA LAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

3.8/5 (4 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINU70109DL2006PLC151260
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressOffice No 202, 2nd Floor, A-18, Rama House, Middle Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 Delhi New Delhi DL 110001 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When it comes to property development, choosing the right builder is paramount for ensuring a smooth purchasing experience and a secure investment. In this post, we delve into the case of Lucina Land Development Limited, a builder with a notable legal record that draws attention from potential buyers in Maharashtra.

Overview of Legal Challenges

Lucina Land Development Limited has faced a total of 4 complaints against it, with notable results: 0 cases won and 4 cases lost. This data raises red flags for potential homebuyers, as it highlights the builder's consistent challenges in legal disputes.

Analysis of Lost Cases

While specific details regarding the nature of the complaints are not provided, it is clear that each case resulted in a loss for Lucina Land Development Limited, suggesting possible deficiencies in their contract obligations or project delivery. A common thread in the details points to a potential lack …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Document Submission Compliance Written Submissions Requirement Relevance of Referred Documents

Analysis of the cases filed against Lucina Land Development Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: compliance with document submission, the necessity of written submissions, and the relevance of documents referred to in the complaints.

The first type of cases revolved around the builder's compliance with submitting necessary documents. In these instances, the allottees claimed that the documents were part and parcel of the complaint and had been previously referred to in the impugned order. The builder, on the other hand, contested this by stating that the documents were either not produced during the complaint proceedings or were not relevant to the case at hand. The tribunal consistently dismissed the builder's application, indicating a pattern where the builder likely misjudged the importance and relevance of the submitted documents.

The second …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review