
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Analyzing M G HOUSING Private Limited: Performance and Consumer Insights
M G HOUSING Private Limited, a builder based in Haryana, has become a focal point for discussions around property acquisitions, especially in light of its legal track record. In this post, we will explore the builder’s performance regarding consumer complaints, case outcomes, and offer insights for potential buyers thinking about investing with them.
Overview of Legal Performance
With a total of 62 complaints filed against them, M G HOUSING has experienced significant legal challenges. Here’s a breakdown of their performance in these cases:
- Cases Won: 8
- Cases Lost: 54
- Cases where the builder filed and lost: 1
Out of the total complaints, the vast majority have resulted in losses for the builder, showing a concerning trend that prospective buyers should carefully consider.
Patterns in Lost Cases
Common Factors:
- Refund Claims: A significant theme in the cases lost pertains to claims …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against M G HOUSING Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, refund disputes, and arguments over interest compensation for these delays.
Many of the complainants, who had paid significant portions of their agreed-upon fees (often over 95%), alleged that the builder failed to deliver possession of their units on time. The builder consistently attributed these delays to force majeure circumstances and contested the obligation to pay interest on the delayed deliveries. However, the authority did not accept this defense and repeatedly ordered the builder to deliver possession along with interest compensation.
Many cases also centered around the issue of refunds, with complainants seeking to recoup amounts they had deposited due to the builder’s inability to provide timely possession. The builder frequently claimed that the authority lacked jurisdiction to grant refunds, but this …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder M G HOUSING Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several insights into the nature of disputes associated with this builder.
Firstly, the builder’s cases predominantly fall into three main themes: Payment Disputes, Cancellation of Allotment, and Forfeiture of Booking Amount. In the realm of Payment Disputes, the builder often sought recovery from respondents who had failed to pay due installments. On the other hand, disputes regarding Cancellation of Allotment surfaced when clients claimed they were wrongfully denied their rights after payment issues arose. Additionally, cases involving Forfeiture of Booking Amount indicated contention around the financial penalties imposed after cancellations.
The reasons for the builder bringing cases to court often revolved around contesting the claims of unpaid dues from purchasers and attempting to enforce cancellations of allotments which they believed were justified. The builder seemed to frequently argue that the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases can be grouped under two key themes: Refund Claims and Jurisdictional Disputes.
Refund Claims made by appellants highlight a recurring issue where buyers requested a refund of the amounts they had deposited for plots.
This situation often stems from buyers feeling dissatisfied for various reasons, leading them to seek legal recourse to recover their funds.
On the other hand, Jurisdictional Disputes emerged where the builder contested the authority of the deciding body, indicating that the venue for resolving such claims was improperly selected or exceeded its regulatory bounds.
In essence, these disputes showcase a combination of buyer dissatisfaction, regulatory misunderstandings, and financial conflicts within the housing market.
The reasons driving these cases include claims of refunds following alleged non-compliance with agreed conditions, such as the timeline for possession or project …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!