M3M INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED logo

M3M INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

4.4/5 (235 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gurugram, Haryana, National Capital Territory Of Delhi
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

M3M India Private Limited is a prominent player in the real estate sector with operations primarily in Haryana, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, and Gurugram. However, its legal history raises several questions regarding its reliability and the quality of its projects. In this blog post, we delve into the builder's performance by analyzing the complaints and legal cases faced by M3M India Private Limited

Overview of Legal Cases

With a total of 235 complaints lodged against it, M3M India has seen a significant number of legal disputes. Out of these, the builder won 122 cases while losing 113 cases. This breakdown of outcomes offers insight into the builder's reputation and operational challenges.

Cases Lost by M3M India

Within the 113 cases lost, several patterns can be observed:

  1. Withdrawal due to Settlements: A considerable number of cases were dismissed as withdrawn after parties reached settlement, showing …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Compensation Disputes Non-Compliance with RERA Penalties for Project Delays Misrepresentation and Advance Payment Issues Settlements and Withdrawals

Analysis of the cases filed against M3M India Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals a multitude of challenges faced by homebuyers and commercial unit purchasers. The cases highlight several recurring themes that provide insight into the builder's operational practices and adherence to regulatory standards.

The primary theme among the disputes is Delayed Possession Claims. Numerous cases were filed by buyers who claimed that M3M India Private Limited failed to deliver possession of residential and commercial units within the stipulated time frame. This led to a series of legal battles where buyers sought refunds, compensation for delays, and interest on their investments. For instance, there were cases where buyers provided full payment for units yet faced extended waiting periods without possession, prompting them to seek refunds and damages.

Refund and Compensation Disputes also emerged as a significant theme. Buyers often found themselves in disagreements with the builder over the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Withdrawal of Complaints Refund and Payment Disputes Possession Issues Settlement Agreements Interest Payment Disputes

The analysis of the cases filed by M3M India Private Limited, a builder, which it lost, reveals several recurring themes and insights into its legal disputes.

1. Withdrawal of Complaints:

A significant number of cases resulted in withdrawals, indicating that the builder often opted to settle disputes outside of the court system. This trend suggests an inclination towards resolution before litigation escalates. The cases dismissed as withdrawn frequently cited settlements or statements from the builder's counsel regarding the status of possession or unpaid dues.

2. Refund and Payment Disputes:

Several cases highlighted disputes over refunds and payment failures. In instances where the builder contested claims from allottees for refunds due to alleged delays or defaults, the courts sided with the allottees. This signals that M3M India frequently faced issues related to the timely execution of Builder Buyer Agreements and the obligation to reimburse purchasers.

3. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Payments Disputes over Legal Amends and Agreements Settlement and Withdrawn Complaints Regulatory Compliance and Timely Payments

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several recurring themes that highlight the primary disputes M3M INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED frequently encountered.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: The majority of cases revolved around accusations of delayed possession of apartments. Claimants often sought compensation for what they perceived as unnecessary delays. However, the builder contested these claims, resulting in the establishment of timelines for either taking possession or addressing outstanding dues, demonstrating adherence to regulatory requirements.
  2. Non-compliance with Payments: Several cases emerged from buyers’ failure to make timely payments. Builders sought to enforce payment agreements legally, leading to directives from the authorities for buyers to comply with their financial obligations.
  3. Disputes over Legal Amends and Agreements: Some cases involved legal challenges concerning amendments in agreements or complaints, where the builder argued for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Contractual Obligations Withdrawal of Complaints or Appeals Settlement and Amicable Resolutions Claims for Refund and Earnest Money Forfeiture Joinder of Necessary Parties

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes against M3M India Private Limited can be categorized into several recurring themes that highlight the nature of legal challenges faced by the builder.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many cases revolved around allegations of delayed possession of residential or commercial units. Complainants often claimed M3M India failed to deliver units within the promised timeline. However, the builder was able to justify its stance by demonstrating compliance with extended delivery timelines as per contract provisions.
  2. Non-compliance with Contractual Obligations: A significant number of cases involved claims where complainants alleged that the builder did not meet its contractual obligations, such as payment refunds or project completions. The builder's defense was primarily based on demonstrating that the complainants had failed to fulfill their own contractual obligations, which nullified their claims.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review