CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, buyers often find themselves at a crossroads when selecting a builder. One such builder that has garnered attention is Mahaketu Promoters & Developers Private Limited. With a modest presence in Madhya Pradesh, this company has been part of several legal disputes that warrant a closer look. In this blog post, we will analyze the performance of Mahaketu Promoters & Developers based on their legal cases, drawing insights into the builder's reliability and providing guidance for potential buyers.
Mahaketu Promoters & Developers has faced a total of two complaints, culminating in both cases resulting in unfavorable outcomes for the company. Notably, the details surrounding these legal disputes reveal much about the builder's operational practices and customer relations.
The builder has lost two cases which, although resolved through agreements, highlight some common patterns. Primarily, the issues revolved around financial disputes and the timely delivery of properties. The claims made by applicants both suggest difficulties in transaction clarity and a lack of effective communication regarding payment schedules and possession timelines. This may indicate a potential gap in operational practices relating to customer service and contract enforcement.
Cases Resolved:Interestingly, both cases that were ultimately settled show a willingness on the part of the builder to engage in discussions to reach a resolution. This could reflect a positive aspect of Mahaketu Promoters & Developers, suggesting they prefer to negotiate settlements rather than prolong disputes. However, the fact that both resolutions stemmed from complaints indicates underlying issues that may affect buyers.
Based on the data provided, Mahaketu Promoters & Developers Private Limited exhibits a mixed record in terms of customer satisfaction and legal conduct. With two cases lost and resolved through agreements, potential buyers should approach with caution.
In conclusion, while Mahaketu Promoters & Developers Private Limited has shown some ability to resolve conflicts amicably, the underlying issues revealed in their legal disputes should prompt careful consideration before proceeding with any transactions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Mahaketu Promoters & Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and arbitrary demands.
The delayed possession claims primarily revolved around the builder's failure to deliver properties on time, with one significant case noting a delay of four months in possession of the plot. In this context, the builder faced scrutiny for charging interest on the allottee, which further aggravated the claims of unfair practices.
Payment disputes constituted another major theme, where the builder was accused of demanding arbitrary amounts from buyers. The builder's defense often centered around claims of delayed or incomplete payments from the applicants. However, the resolution through mid-way agreements suggests that there may have been some legitimacy to the buyers' claims of overcharging or miscommunication regarding payment amounts.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court include contesting what they perceived as unfair penalties for delays, disputing the builder's accounting practices, and alleging non-compliance with the agreed-upon terms of sale. A pattern emerges wherein the builder’s litigation often stemmed from an inability to meet project timelines and disagreements over financial obligations.
Examining the outcomes of these cases, it is evident that the builder lost primarily due to a combination of factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely deliveries and justified payments, along with a general lack of transparency in their dealings, likely contributed to the resolutions against them. Furthermore, the agreements reached suggest that the builder may have either misunderstood or failed to adhere to established regulations regarding property sales and development, which could have implications for their operational practices.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-R-8-528 | Not provided | The applicant, Mr. Nilesh Kalwadia, filed a case … | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Mr. Nilesh Kalwadia | Mahaketu Promoters … | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/385828515333.pdf |
4-II Sh)-9-0676 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Ruchi Kapoor, sought relief agains… | ["Mid-way agreement… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Ruchi Kapoor | Mahaketu Promoters … | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/777177617096.pdf |