CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Choosing the right builder for your home can be a daunting task. With many options available, buyers must carefully evaluate builders based on their track record, complaints, and legal matters. In this blog, we will delve into the performance of Mahavir Builders, a developer operating in Odisha, to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
Mahavir Builders is recognized as a player in the real estate sector within the state of Odisha. However, a closer examination of their legal history reveals some concerning aspects that potential customers should consider before engaging with them.
When assessing Mahavir Builders' performance through the lens of legal disputes, we observe the following:
This indicates that the builder has faced two significant legal challenges, both of which were lost, resulting in unfavorable outcomes.
The two completed cases filed against Mahavir Builders highlight certain patterns:
Interestingly, there were no cases won by Mahavir Builders when looking specifically at those with appeal outcomes. Thus, it's crucial to note that while there has been legal activity, none has resulted in a favorable outcome for the builder in disputes with former clients.
Based on the available data, Mahavir Builders presents a questionable choice for potential buyers. With zero successful legal outcomes and both cases resulting in penalties without resolution of the initial complaints, there are clear red flags regarding the company’s operational transparency and reliability.
In conclusion, while Mahavir Builders operates in Odisha, their legal history raises concerns that potential buyers should carefully consider. With proper diligence and due process, buyers can avoid potential pitfalls and make informed decisions about their investments in real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Mahavir Builders, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: penalties for project delays, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project documentation.
The first type of case frequently involves penalties imposed on the builder for delays in project completion. In these instances, the builder was typically directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 10,000, indicating a consistent pattern of punitive measures against the builder for failing to meet project timelines. This suggests that one common reason people brought cases against Mahavir Builders was the builder's inability to deliver projects on schedule, which likely caused frustration and financial loss for buyers and investors.
The second category of cases centers on the builder's non-compliance with regulatory requirements. While the specifics of the claims remain unspecified in the summaries, the consistent mention of penalties and the need to upload required Quality Progress Reports (QPRs) implies that Mahavir Builders may have faced challenges in adhering to construction quality standards or regulatory filing obligations. This highlights another pattern where disputes may have stemmed from the builder’s failure to fulfill legal or regulatory duties, leading to actions taken by the other parties involved.
The third theme, which can be inferred from the requirements to upload QPRs, relates to disputes over project documentation. It appears that there may have been issues concerning the builder's maintenance or provision of necessary project documents, which could have obstructed transparency and communication with buyers or oversight bodies.
Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that the builder lost primarily due to non-compliance with critical regulatory requirements and project timelines. The specified penalties indicate a systematic failure to meet standards that are likely crucial for the integrity of construction projects. Furthermore, the recurring need to direct the builder to upload essential documentation highlights a failure in project management and compliance, which would undermine trust in the builder's operations.
Overall, these cases reflect common issues that potential buyers should consider when evaluating builders, emphasizing the importance of transparency, regulatory compliance, and timely project delivery.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["RERA Act violatio… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Mahavir Builders | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/103-of-2024-1.pdf | |
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["Violation of RERA… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Mahavir Builders | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/175-of-2024-1.pdf |