| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Malabar Developers Private Limited, a real estate builder primarily operating in Kerala, has recently come under the spotlight due to its legal battles involving complaints from clients. In this blog, we will analyze the builder's legal history, particularly focusing on the cases won and lost, as well as offer some insights for prospective buyers considering their services.
Overview of Legal Cases
Malabar Developers Private Limited has experienced a total of two complaints against them, with the unfortunate outcome of both cases resulting in losses. On the surface, this raises concerns about the builder's credibility and reliability in fulfilling their contractual obligations. Let's delve into the specifics of these cases to understand the common patterns that led to the losses and explore the one case where an agreement resulted in a joint compromise.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
Malabar Developers has lost both cases filed against them. Here’s a closer …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Malabar Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: refund claims due to non-delivery of promised real estate projects and disputes over payment defaults and the entitlement to refunds along with interest.
The first type of cases involves claims made by buyers seeking substantial refunds—such as Rs. 62,70,811/- and Rs. 79,26,454/-—due to the builder's failure to deliver completed projects on time. These cases highlight significant trust violations in the real estate transactions, where buyers were left waiting for their invested units without any resolution.
The second category of disputes centers around the builder's counterclaims of payment defaults by buyers. In one notable case, the builder argued that the complainant had defaulted on payments and thus was not eligible for a refund. However, the decision ultimately favored the buyer, indicating a legal …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!