MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED logo

MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED

4.2/5 (13 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINU70101RJ2011PTC037342
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressOffice No.14, 4th Floor, Unique Destination Laxmi Mandir Crossing, Tonk Road Jaipur Jaipur RJ 302015 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED operates primarily in Rajasthan and has garnered attention within the real estate sector. With a fair amount of legal disputes, buyer apprehension about this builder's credibility is warranted. This post aims to analyze the builder's legal history, highlight trends from their cases, and provide a grounded assessment for potential homebuyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

The builder has been involved in numerous legal disputes, culminating in a total of 13 complaints, of which they won 4 and lost 9. The split between cases filed by the builder and those against them reveals pertinent insights.

Cases Where the Builder Filed

  1. Cases Lost: The builder filed 2 cases and lost both. A common thread in these cases is that the appeals were dismissed as becoming infructuous due to subsequent developments or withdrawal of prior complaints.
  2. Cases Won: The builder was successful in 1 case where they argued …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund Disputes Failure to Execute Agreement for Sale Project Completion Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Mantra Lifestyle Homes Private Limited, which the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Refund Disputes, Failure to Execute Agreement for Sale, and Project Completion Delays.

Many of the complaints revolved around the builder's inability to deliver possession of flats on time. For instance, in one case, the complainant sought compensation and interest after the builder failed to hand over the flat despite repeated promises and payments made. The builder's defense—that the project was not completed and the agreement was executed before the RERA Act came into effect—did not stand, leading to a direct order from the authority to pay interest and deliver possession.

Refund disputes emerged as another common theme. In multiple cases, buyers sought refunds due to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Appeal Dismissals Infructuous Proceedings Regulatory Compliance Issues

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, which it ultimately lost, reveals some significant trends about the nature and outcomes of these disputes.

The cases can be grouped under common themes such as Appeal Dismissals and Infructuous Proceedings. A recurring theme noticed in these cases is that many appeals were dismissed due to them becoming infructuous. This indicates that either the issues at hand became moot over time, possibly resolved outside of the court's purview, or that both parties moved on from the disputes without resolution through hearings.

Commonly, the builder brought cases to court contesting decisions that appeared adverse to its interests. The appeals may have stemmed from contesting penalties imposed or trying to challenge project delays attributed to circumstances beyond their immediate control. However, a significant factor to note is that these appeals lacked sufficient grounds when faced with …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Disputes over Authority Orders

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information.

The builder's cases primarily revolve around themes of regulatory non-compliance and disputes over authority orders.

In these cases, MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES contested actions that they believed stemmed from improper procedures or unconstitutional directives issued by regulatory authorities.

The builder claimed that proceedings were not initiated by the appropriately designated authority according to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, emphasizing procedural discrepancies in these cases.

Notably, the respondents in these cases did not present any counterclaims, effectively leaving the builder's narratives largely unchallenged.

The final verdict in such matters often involved the quashing of impugned orders and directions for reconsideration by the appropriate authorities, highlighting a significant procedural oversight that worked in favor of the builder.

The common reasons for bringing these cases to court included compelling …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Claims for Payment of Deposits Failure to Execute and Register Agreements Failure to Appear for Hearings

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, MANTRA LIFESTYLE HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes principally revolved around several key themes that highlighted the nature of the complaints against the builder. These themes included Claims for Payment of Deposits, where complainants contested outstanding amounts; Failure to Execute and Register Agreements, where there were disagreements regarding agreements for sale being duly executed; and Failure to Appear for Hearings, which demonstrated instances where complainants did not follow through on their claims, resulting in dismissals in default.

The reasons these cases were brought to court often stemmed from claims regarding alleged non-payment, failure to finalize agreements, or general dissatisfaction with project timelines. In particular, some claims indicated misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding financial transactions or contractual obligations. A consistent pattern emerged where buyers or opposing parties sometimes exhibited a lack of sufficient evidence to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review