MAULI SAI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | U45201MH2004PTC144062 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 19-Jan-04 |
| Address | 1st Floor, Mauli Plaza, Mauli Bharat Udyog Nagar, Beside Sainath Ind. Estate, Kotkar Rd, G oregaon(E) , Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400063 |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited is a real estate builder operating primarily in Maharashtra. With a focus on residential and commercial developments, potential buyers may wonder about the builder's track record, especially in light of legal disputes. This blog post examines the builder's performance in the face of complaints and legal cases, providing insights for prospective homebuyers.
Builder Profile
- Name: Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited
- Number of Complaints: 2
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
- States with Projects: Maharashtra
Legal Case Details
Mauli Sai Developers has experienced legal challenges, with a total of 2 cases filed against them, which they lost. In separate cases filed against the builder, they sought to condone a delay of 10 days in appealing decisions. The tribunal allowed this application, indicating some procedural leniency but no substantive victory for the builder.
Case Analysis
Common Factors in Lost Cases
- Outcome Pattern: The builder lost both cases filed against them, indicating a potential trend of unfavorable outcomes in legal disputes.
- Lack of Substantial Wins: A deeper analysis of the cases reveals that although the builder sought to condone appeal delays, this does not reflect a successful defense or resolution in favor of their position.
Common Factors in Won Cases
- Technical Objections: The cases allowed by the tribunal involved technical objections raised by the respondent's counsel, focusing primarily on procedural aspects rather than substantive claims about the builder's performance or legality. This suggests that while Mauli Sai Developers has navigated procedural hurdles, they have not achieved wins that reflect positively on their operational practices or project integrity.
Conclusion
Based on the data provided, Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited shows a concerning pattern of lost legal cases, which may raise questions about their reliability and trustworthiness in the residential market. The absence of wins suggests that potential buyers should proceed with caution and perform thorough due diligence.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Comprehensive Research: Review past projects of the builder along with the feedback and reviews from other homebuyers.
- Evaluate Legal History: Consider the builder's legal track record, including any ongoing or historical disputes, before making a purchase decision.
- Demand Transparency: Ask for clarity about the project's timelines, documentation, and compliance with local regulations during negotiations.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Credentials and Experience: Verify the builder's registration with local authorities and review their experience in the real estate market.
- Assess Quality of Work: Visit previous projects for quality assessment and gather testimonials from current residents.
- Understand Financing Options: Familiarize yourself with various financing options available for your purchase and ask the builder for assistance.
- Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all agreements, including timelines, pricing, and specifications, are documented legally to protect your interests.
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right builder is a critical step in the home-buying journey. While Mauli Sai Developers has faced challenges, being proactive and informed can lead to better decision-making in selecting a property that meets your needs and expectations.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delays in filing appeals and technical objections raised by the respondent's counsel.
The first type of case involved the applicants seeking to condone a delay of 10 days in filing their appeals. This indicates a common issue where parties may not adhere to the required timelines, leading to additional legal scrutiny. The builder’s repeated failure to file appeals on time suggests a potential systematic problem within their legal compliance procedures.
The second theme emerged from the technical objections raised by Mr. Jaineel Vashi, the respondent's counsel. He denied the contents of para 5 of the application, which shows that parties often contest the validity or accuracy of the information presented in legal documents. This could stem from miscommunication, misinformation, or a genuine dispute over the facts of the case.
A pattern observed from these summaries is that the builder faced challenges related to adherence to legal procedures and timelines, as well as issues related to the credibility and accuracy of their legal submissions. The common triggers for litigation in these cases were the delays in filing appeals and the disputes over the content of the applications.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to meet the required filing deadlines and the convincing technical objections presented by the respondent’s counsel. Insufficient evidence to support their appeals or validate the information contained within might have also contributed to the unfavorable outcomes. It is essential for the builder to address these compliance and procedural issues to improve their chances of success in future legal matters.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000174640 | Maharashtra | Applicants sought to condone a delay of 10 days i… | ["Delay condoned"] | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants sought to con… | Anr. | Mauli Sai Developer… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=14ZP8wcnULwihw3Q4O9fe7KQc9qqQll5y |