| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
As potential homebuyers, selecting the right builder is a critical decision that can affect your future living experience. One builder you might come across in Chhattisgarh is Metro Infrastructures. In this blog post, we will analyze the legal standing of Metro Infrastructures based on available data, exploring their complaint history and any patterns that may emerge from their legal cases.
Builder Overview
Metro Infrastructures currently operates within Chhattisgarh and has a record of only 1 complaint filed against it. Unfortunately for potential buyers, the outcomes of legal disputes against this builder reveal a trend worth examining.Legal Case Details
Metro Infrastructures has been involved in one notable legal case. The case was initiated by the Chhattisgarh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), which claimed that Metro Infrastructures failed to operate its RERA specified account in compliance with the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder, …Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Metro Infrastructures, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The primary theme observed in these cases revolves around the builder's non-compliance with the provisions outlined in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA).
The cases highlight the importance of adhering to the regulatory framework established by RERA, particularly concerning the operation of specified accounts. In one notable case, Chhattisgarh RERA claimed that Metro Infrastructures had failed to operate its RERA specified account in accordance with the Act's provisions. The builder's defense argued compliance, yet the culmination of the case ended in the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 40,000, signaling a legal acknowledgment of non-compliance.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases primarily involve regulatory non-compliance, resulting in legal actions taken by RERA authorities. People may contest such penalties to defend their …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!