| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate development, trust and reliability are paramount for buyers wishing to invest in projects. MS Infrastructure, predominantly operating in Gujarat, has recently made headlines due to its legal encounters and customer satisfaction levels. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's performance based on available complaint data and legal case outcomes, all while offering insights for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
MS Infrastructure has been involved in a total of 1 documented complaint. The outcome of their legal endeavors reveals crucial insights into their operations:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Case Details
- Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged that MS Infrastructure failed to submit the final report on their project 'Silk Heritage Industrial Park' within the time limit.
- Respondent Claim: The builder contended that the project was completed before the deadline but cited unforeseen circumstances for the delay …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against MS Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into penalties for project delays, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project completion reporting.
The primary reason for the imposition of penalties in these cases was the builder's failure to adhere to the prescribed timelines for project completion and reporting. As exemplified by the case of the 'Silk Heritage Industrial Park,' the builder faced a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for not submitting the final project report within the stipulated time frame. The builder's defense of 'unforeseen circumstances' was insufficient to mitigate the penalty, indicating a strict adherence to deadlines by the authorities.
A common pattern observed in the cases is the builder's tendency to attribute delays to other parties or to cite circumstances beyond their control. However, the verdicts suggest that the builder's accountability …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!