| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate development, trust and reliability are paramount for buyers wishing to invest in projects. MS Infrastructure, predominantly operating in Gujarat, has recently made headlines due to its legal encounters and customer satisfaction levels. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's performance based on available complaint data and legal case outcomes, all while offering insights for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
MS Infrastructure has been involved in a total of 1 documented complaint. The outcome of their legal endeavors reveals crucial insights into their operations:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Case Details
- Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged that MS Infrastructure failed to submit the final report on their project 'Silk Heritage Industrial Park' within the time limit.
- Respondent Claim: The builder contended that the project was completed before the deadline but cited unforeseen circumstances for the delay in submitting the final documentation.
- Final Verdict: The arbitrating authority found the builder liable, imposing a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for not adhering to the required timeline for submitting the project report.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
The lone case against MS Infrastructure reflects a critical aspect of their operational approach:
- Common Factors: The failure to submit necessary documentation within the agreed timeframe appears to be a key reason leading to the adverse ruling. This could indicate potential issues in project management or administrative practices within the company.
Cases Won
Interestingly, MS Infrastructure has not won any cases, suggesting a trend wherein they may lack adequate defense mechanisms or contingency plans to address legal challenges effectively. This absence of success may signal deeper operational flaws in the company’s ability to handle disputes.
Overall Assessment of MS Infrastructure
Based on the sparse data available, MS Infrastructure's legal history reflects a challenging landscape for the builder, particularly highlighted by their singular complaint and the subsequent verdict against them. A penalty for administrative lapses is indicative of potential risk factors for prospective buyers, including concerns regarding project completion timelines and documentation practices.
Tips for Potential Buyers Consider Purchasing from MS Infrastructure
- Research Thoroughly: Ensure that you examine any available reviews and talk to previous clients about their experiences with the builder.
- Check Legal Compliance: Verify whether the builder adheres to all necessary legal and regulatory frameworks. Assess their history regarding project completion and documentation.
- Ensure Clarity in Contracts: Seek clarity on timelines, deliverables, and penalties before signing any contracts to protect your interests.
- Seek Professional Aid: Consider hiring a legal professional to review contracts and terms, especially if you have concerns about the builder’s reliability based on their past performance.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Evaluate Reputation: Look for builders with a solid reputation backed by customer testimonials and successful project completions.
- Engagement in Communication: Choose builders who are prompt and clear in their communication, fostering transparency throughout the buying process.
- Inspect Various Projects: If possible, visit existing projects to assess the quality and execution of the builder’s work before making a decision.
- Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder has a history of financial stability to mitigate risks associated with project delays or failures.
Conclusion
Navigating the real estate market can pose significant challenges, and choosing the right builder is a critical part of this journey. While MS Infrastructure operates in Gujarat and has only one complaint noted, the outcome of this legal case serves as a cautionary tale for potential customers. By conducting thorough research and adhering to the tips outlined, buyers can make more informed decisions when it comes to their investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against MS Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into penalties for project delays, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project completion reporting.
The primary reason for the imposition of penalties in these cases was the builder's failure to adhere to the prescribed timelines for project completion and reporting. As exemplified by the case of the 'Silk Heritage Industrial Park,' the builder faced a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for not submitting the final project report within the stipulated time frame. The builder's defense of 'unforeseen circumstances' was insufficient to mitigate the penalty, indicating a strict adherence to deadlines by the authorities.
A common pattern observed in the cases is the builder's tendency to attribute delays to other parties or to cite circumstances beyond their control. However, the verdicts suggest that the builder's accountability for meeting timelines and compliance with procedures was not adequately fulfilled.
The underlying reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases include:
- Insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely completion and submission of reports.
- A lack of compliance with the regulatory requirements governing project reporting and timelines.
- A failure to understand or adhere to the classification rules regarding project completion and reporting, which led to misunderstandings and errors in their submissions.
Overall, the analysis highlights the importance for builders to ensure prompt communication and compliance with the established regulations in the real estate sector. Buyers should take note of these patterns as they could indicate potential risks regarding the builder's reliability and the timely delivery of projects.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Surat/2… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority impo… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | MS Infrastructure | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=15NBN5QDv6sTchJrJ2KeOUOCpKhhr58ku |