MVL LIMITED logo

MVL LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINL45200DL2006PLC154848
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address1201 B, 12th FLOOR HEMKUNT CHAMBER, 89 NEHRU PLACE NEW DELHI DL 110019 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

An In-Depth Review of MVL Limited: Understanding Their Legal Standing

When looking for a builder, it's crucial to consider their track record in terms of customer satisfaction and legal history. One builder worth analyzing is MVL Limited, which has been operating primarily in Rajasthan. In this blog post, we take a closer look at the legal cases involving the builder, their outcomes, and what potential buyers should keep in mind when considering a purchase from them.

Legal Case Overview

As per the available data, MVL Limited has had one recorded complaint against them. The details of this legal case shed light on the builder's approach to customer grievances and how it interacts with regulatory authorities.

Summary of the Case
  • The complainant alleged that MVL Limited failed to refund the amount received, even after an order was issued by the Authority.
  • In response, MVL Limited maintained that the Authority …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Refund Disputes Competence of Authority Provisional Liquidation

Analysis of the cases filed against MVL Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Refund Disputes, Competence of Authority, and Provisional Liquidation.

The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to comply with the Authority's orders, particularly concerning refunds. In one notable instance, the complainant claimed that MVL Limited did not refund the amount received despite the Authority's order. This highlights a significant area of concern, as it reflects a broader trend of dissatisfaction with the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting the builder's obligations to provide refunds, challenging the Authority's competence to order such actions, and navigating the complexities introduced by the appointment of a provisional liquidator. The builder's defense often hinged on claims of insufficient authority on the part of the regulators, which …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review