| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market of Gujarat, buyers are always on the lookout for trustworthy builders. One such name is Nakshatra Developers, who, despite only having one recorded complaint, has a complex legal history that potential buyers should carefully consider.
Overview of Nakshatra Developers
Nakshatra Developers has garnered attention in the real estate sector, especially within Gujarat. However, the builder has faced significant scrutiny due to its litigation history. With one case filed against them, which they lost, the implications of this legal entanglement raise questions about the builder's reliability.
Legal Case Overview
The sole legal case filed against Nakshatra Developers is significant enough to warrant close attention.
- Case Summary:
The respondent claimed that Nakshatra Developers had acknowledged their mistake and promised to submit the annual audit report by a specified date.
- Final Verdict:
The Authority ordered Nakshatra Developers to pay a penalty and to comply with the …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Nakshatra Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: non-compliance with regulatory orders, disputes over project delays, and penalties for late submission of documentation.
The first theme, non-compliance with regulatory orders, highlights the builder's challenges with adhering to the requirements set forth by the Authority. This includes failing to submit mandatory annual audit reports on time, which reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations.
The second theme revolves around disputes over project delays. While the specifics of the delays vary, the common thread among these cases is the builder's tendency to attribute delays to other parties rather than taking responsibility themselves. This defensive posture indicates a lack of transparency and accountability in their project management practices.
The third theme, penalties for late submission of documentation, directly relates to the first …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!