CIN | U45200DL2011PTC214653 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | B-1, G/F EAST BALDEV PARK KRISHNA NAGAR NEW DELHI East Delhi DL 110051 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
NANDI INFRATECH Private Limited is a real estate builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. With a track record that includes three complaints, the company has won two of the cases brought against it while losing one. This blog post aims to analyze NANDI INFRATECH's performance in legal matters, providing insights for potential buyers and offering general tips for selecting a reputable builder.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
The builder has experienced one notable loss that highlights certain patterns in legal disputes:
- Retention of Funds: In the case where NANDI INFRATECH lost, the complaint revolved around the appellant's claims regarding the non-payment of the balance sale price and additional charges as outlined in the allotment letter. This suggests a recurring issue related to the financial terms of agreements.
- Possession Delays: The respondent's claim about delayed possession of the flat raises concerns about timely delivery and effective communication between the builder …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Nandi Infratech Private Limited, in which the builder lost, reveals significant insights regarding their legal disputes.
1. Overview of Common Themes:
The cases predominantly center around three key themes:
- Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases indicate that the builder was held accountable for not delivering possession of properties in a timely manner. This theme reflects broader issues regarding project management and fulfillment of timelines.
- Disputes Over Payment and Charges: The builder frequently contested claims related to unpaid balances or extra charges imposed on the respondents. This highlights a recurring tension between builder expectations and buyer perceptions of fairness in financial dealings.
- Regulatory Compliance Issues: The builder's cases often involved elements of regulatory adherence, specifically concerning decisions made by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, suggesting potential shortcomings in maintaining compliance with established guidelines.
…
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes highlighted in these cases primarily fall into a few key themes, chiefly revolving around Cash Back Disputes, Contractual Claims, and Litigation due to Buyer Claims.
In the cases concerning cash back disputes, as seen in the summaries, the builder consistently claimed that issues related to cash back entitlements could not be entertained under the provisions of the Act 2016. Conversely, respondents sought refunds or cash backs based on their financial commitments made during the booking process. Despite such claims, the legal outcomes favored the builder, reinforcing their position against unwarranted financial entitlements claimed by buyers.
The builder often approached the courts to contest claims attributed to cash back or refund requests, suggesting a proactive stance in defending its financial interests and contractual obligations. Furthermore, the summaries indicate that the builder's …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!