NARMADA ASBESTOS PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Rajasthan
| CIN | U26956RJ2006PTC074148 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 24-Mar-06 |
| Address | OFFICE NO. 209, 2ND FLOOR KRISH CITY CENTRE, TAPUKARA Bhiwadi Alwar RJ 301019 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a builder for property investment, potential buyers must evaluate various factors, including the builder's reputation, history of complaints, and overall reliability. In this post, we will delve into the legal history of Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited, examining their performance in complaints and legal cases.
Overview of Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited
Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited is primarily active in Rajasthan and has a record of one complaint against them. Importantly, they have successfully won one case while incurring no losses in legal disputes outside of the single cited complaint.
Legal Case Analysis
Case Filed Against the Builder (Where the Builder Lost)
- Claim from the Complainant: The complainant argued that Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited failed to deliver possession of the flat within the stipulated timeframe and sought a refund of their booking amount.
- Builder's Defense: The builder claimed that the project was not obliged to be registered under the Real Estate Act as it did not qualify as an ongoing project.
- Final Verdict: The Authority dismissed the complaint on the grounds that the project was indeed not liable for registration under the Real Estate Act.
Patterns in Legal Cases
Cases Lost:The single case the builder lost exhibits a common pattern where delays in project completion lead to claims for refunds. However, the outcome hinged on the specifics of the Real Estate Act and the classification of the project.
Cases Won:Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited successfully navigated the legal system in the case they won, which likely stems from their adherence to regulatory guidelines and effective legal representation. This implies a level of diligence on their part regarding project compliance and documentation.
Conclusion
Based on the data available, Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited shows a strong track record with only one complaint leading to a loss, which was ultimately dismissed in their favor due to legal technicalities. This suggests that while they may have experienced a delay in project delivery, they have a solid grasp of compliance with regulatory frameworks.
Tips for Potential Buyers
For anyone considering a purchase from Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited, here are several recommendations:
- Thoroughly Review Contracts: Make sure to understand the timelines and obligations outlined in the agreement.
- Verify Project Status: Before making a booking, check if the project is officially registered and classified under the appropriate regulatory frameworks.
- Communicate Clearly: Maintain open channels of communication with the builder to stay informed about project progress.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research Past Projects: Investigate previous projects completed by the builder to assess quality and on-time delivery.
- Look for Reviews: Read reviews and testimonials from past clients to gather insights on the builder’s reputation.
- Check Legal History: A review of any complaints or legal cases can reveal patterns in service and delivery.
By keeping these factors in mind, potential buyers can make informed decisions when considering a purchase with Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited or any builder in the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around claims of delayed possession and regulatory non-compliance, specifically pertaining to the registration of projects under the Real Estate Act. In these instances, the complainants alleged that the builder failed to deliver flats on schedule and sought refunds for their booking amounts. However, the builder successfully argued that the project was not ongoing and, therefore, not subject to the registration requirements of the Real Estate Act. This is a significant detail as it underscores the complexities of real estate regulations and the obligations of builders rather than presenting them as standard violators of customer expectations.
These cases highlight a common theme where disgruntled buyers sought redress through legal means due to delays in possession and perceived non-compliance by the builder. They raised concerns that could emerge from misunderstandings of project status or a lack of awareness regarding the legal stipulations governing real estate transactions.
Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited's successful defense in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, many claims were found to be without sufficient evidence, revealing gaps in the buyer's assertions. Secondly, the builder's argument that the project did not require registration under the Real Estate Act was upheld, demonstrating the value of understanding legal frameworks in real estate. The ability of the builder to navigate these legal nuances and counter claims effectively indicates their informed position in these disputes.
From this analysis, it becomes clear that the builder maintains a strong reputation in a competitive market, often facing allegations that may not fully adhere to the veracity of regulations. The fact that buyers occasionally initiate claims which result in legal confrontations can suggest a potential for misunderstandings or attempts to capitalize on perceived shortcomings. In essential terms, Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited has demonstrated its competence in dealing with claims, showcasing a commitment to regulatory compliance.
Therefore, to potential buyers, it is crucial to approach claims about builders with a discerning eye. While disputes certainly exist within the real estate sector, this analysis clearly shows that established builders, such as Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited, are often equipped to defend themselves against unjust allegations. Therefore, trusted information and thorough research are vital to making informed decisions in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJRERA-C-2018-2640 | Rajasthan | Complaint against Carnation Developers Pvt. Ltd. … | ["Real Estate", "Pr… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Sharad Poddar | Narmada Asbestos Pi… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/63132018-2640.pdf |