| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market, the performance and reputation of a builder can significantly impact the decisions of potential buyers. This post delves into the profile of NAVKAR ASSOCIATES, a builder with a presence in Chhattisgarh, providing insights into their legal history, challenges, and successes.
NAVKAR ASSOCIATES: Quick Facts
- Number of Complaints: 6
- Cases Won: 3
- Cases Lost: 3
- States with Projects: Chhattisgarh
Legal Case Overview
Cases Won
NAVKAR ASSOCIATES has been successful in winning 3 cases, which indicates a reasonable capacity to defend against claims made by buyers. Here’s a summary of the successful cases:
- Case Involving Sale Agreement Execution:
The applicant claimed that despite paying a total of Rs. 4,95,000 in installments, the builder failed to execute a sale agreement and instead demanded an inflated payment based on current market rates. The authority ruled in favor of the applicant, requiring the builder to return the paid …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Navkar Associates, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their legal disputes.
The cases can be primarily grouped into two common themes: Delayed Payment and Refund Claims and Disputes over Common Area Construction and GST.
In the Delayed Payment and Refund Claims, the applicant often cited that despite having paid substantial amounts in installments, Navkar Associates failed to execute the sale agreement. Instead, the builder would demand further payments based on the current market rate, leading to a dispute over the amount owed and the timely delivery of agreements. An example of this is the claim made by an applicant who had paid Rs. 4,95,000/-, only to be met with a demand for more money without an agreement in place.
The Disputes over Common Area Construction and GST revolve around the builder's decision to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, NAVKAR ASSOCIATES, which it won, revealed the following information.
The builder's cases generally revolve around a few key themes:
- Disputes over Common Area Facilities:
The builder was involved in a dispute where the construction of a cafeteria in a common area was contested. Here, the builder defended itself by stating that the cafeteria was built upon the requests of other allottees, showcasing a focus on community needs rather than individual complaints. - Allegations of Illegal Charges:
Another theme emerged regarding claims of additional charges levied in the form of GST. The builder maintained that the additional amounts collected were for specific finishing work rather than unlawful charges, which added complexity to the case.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court to contest penalties imposed by various authorities and to dispute claims regarding project delays or additional charges believed to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, NAVKAR ASSOCIATES, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily centered around claims of structural defects in commercial properties, particularly the 'Golden Trade Centre.' However, common to these cases was the fact that they were initiated after a significant delay, often exceeding the legally stipulated limitation period for filing complaints. The authority dismissed the complaints due to this key reason, illustrating a critical aspect of the legal framework governing real estate transactions.
The complaints were generally filed by buyers alleging various structural issues, seeking redress and relief from the builder. This suggests a somewhat recurring pattern wherein buyers, upon encountering perceived defects, sought legal recourse. However, the timing of such claims played a crucial role in the outcomes of these cases. The legal principle that complaints concerning construction or defects must be filed within a specific time frame …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!