CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to investing in real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial. In this post, we take a closer look at Neelkanth Properties, a builder operating in Gujarat, and examine their track record through the lens of legal complaints and outcomes.
Neelkanth Properties is a builder based in Gujarat with a rather limited history in court disputes. The builder has been involved in one formal complaint, which they lost.
Neelkanth Properties had one legal case lodged against them. Here’s a summary:
Overall, Neelkanth Properties' legal history reflects significant risks for potential buyers. With only one complaint to their name that resulted in a veritable loss, it casts doubts on their reliability as a builder.
In conclusion, potential buyers should weigh their options carefully when considering Neelkanth Properties, paying attention to the implications of the builder's limited but impactful legal history.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Neelkanth Properties, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around three topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over payment and construction completion, and compensation for mental anguish and legal expenses.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers who were unable to receive possession of their units on time, leading to significant emotional distress and financial burdens. Buyers often sought refunds for amounts paid, as well as compensation for the mental anguish and legal expenses incurred while navigating these disputes. The builder's common defense was to blame the delay on the buyers themselves, claiming that they had not made proper payments, which allegedly halted construction. However, the legal verdicts did not uphold this defense, suggesting that the builder's reasoning was insufficient or not rooted in evidence.
A pattern emerges where buyers frequently contested the builder's attributions of fault and sought to recover their investments due to the builder’s failure to deliver on promises. This points to a significant trust violation in the builder-buyer relationship, which is a critical factor in real estate transactions.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a lack of convincing evidence supporting their claims of buyer fault. Additionally, the builder's failure to address the underlying issues of delayed possession and unfulfilled commitments likely contributed to the legal outcomes. The verdicts highlight the importance of adhering to agreed-upon timelines and payment schedules in real estate projects, as well as ensuring open communication and transparency between builders and buyers.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise caution when engaging with builders that have unresolved legal disputes. It is crucial to assess not only the builder's current projects but also their historical performance and legal standing before making any investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1010/00179/1t1121/1… | Gujarat | The complainant sought refund for non-possession … | ["Non-possession of… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu… | Qu. Solanki Surgla … | Neelkanth Properties | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1FMuvHFbDU6mORrvrGv5uf33bpujNOP1e |