NIRALA HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U70200DL2011PTC214476 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 21-Feb-11 |
| Address | 130, 1st Floor, Antkrish Bhawan, Plot No 22 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi Central Delhi DL 110001 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, understanding a builder's credibility and legal standing is crucial for potential buyers. Nirala Housing Private Limited, operating in Uttar Pradesh, presents a unique case for exploration. This blog provides an overview of the builder’s performance in legal matters, analyzes patterns in their complaint history, and offers tips for prospective buyers navigating this landscape.
Builder Overview
Nirala Housing Private Limited has witnessed a total of 1 complaint filed against them. Notably, they have lost this case, resulting in a total of zero cases won in their legal journey so far. Such statistics may raise concerns for potential buyers looking for reliability and trustworthiness from their builders.
Legal Case Insights
Cases Lost
Currently, there’s only one documented case that Nirala Housing Private Limited has lost. The facts around this case reveal that the complaint stemmed from an appeal where the appellant claimed that their lawyer's non-appearance was due to illness. This situation is emblematic of broader challenges that can arise in legal proceedings—issues of representation and timing can significantly impact outcomes.
Cases Won
In contrast, the sole case where the builder won was notably tied to procedural issues rather than a substantive victory. Here, it was a matter of the order being recalled and the appeal restored to its original number. The respondent, in this case, did not contest the grounds of the appeal, suggesting a legal environment where the builder's representation was, at least in some aspects, favorable.
Patterns in Legal Performance
Based on the available information, several patterns emerge:
- Common Factors in Lost Cases:
- The singular lost case suggests that there may be vulnerabilities in legal representation or procedural issues that could affect outcomes. Potential buyers might need to consider how such circumstances might affect the delivery of their projects.
- Common Factors in Won Cases:
- The absence of objections from the respondent in the sole winning case indicates that the builder’s legal arguments may not have been effectively challenged, possibly highlighting a lack of active disputes on procedural matters in their dealings.
Overall Assessment of Nirala Housing Private Limited
With only one complaint leading to a loss and no victories to their name, Nirala Housing Private Limited appears to have a concerning legal track record. The implications for potential buyers suggest a need for cautious engagement with this builder, given that their ability to navigate legal disputes effectively may be in question.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Comprehensive Research: Prospective buyers should delve into the builder's past projects, their legal standing, and any community feedback. Understanding a builder's reputation can offer invaluable insight.
- Consult Legal Advisors: Before engaging in a purchase or signing a contract, it is advisable to seek legal counsel who can offer insights into potential risks and obligations involved in the transaction.
General Tips When Selecting a Builder
- Check Credentials: Always verify the builder’s licensing and regulatory compliance to ensure legitimacy.
- Examine Reviews and Testimonials: Feedback from previous customers can provide a clearer picture of a builder's reliability and quality of work.
- Evaluate Project History: Focus on a builder's successful project delivery timeframes and quality to understand their operational strengths.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while Nirala Housing Private Limited provides potential housing solutions in Uttar Pradesh, their legal history raises questions. Buyers should approach with diligence, prioritizing thorough research and legal advisement to navigate their decisions wisely.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Nirala Housing Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into procedural appeals and delay attribution disputes.
In terms of procedural appeals, the builder's counsel faced issues that hindered their ability to present their case adequately. For instance, the appeal highlighted in the summary shows that the non-appearance of the learned counsel for the builder was attributed to illness, which led to an immediate request to recall the order and restore the appeal. This indicates a pattern where procedural mishaps, rather than the merits of the case itself, could be a common trigger for litigation outcomes.
Delay attribution disputes, on the other hand, encompass cases where the builder contested penalties or delays attributed to their projects. While specific details of delays or penalties have not been disclosed in the summary, it is important to note that in many real estate disputes, builders often argue over who bears the responsibility for project delays. This could involve disputing claims made by homeowners, subcontractors, or regulatory bodies, and often revolves around misunderstandings of project timelines or the classification of delays as justified or unjustified.
The common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases seem to revolve around procedural failures rather than substantive issues with their projects. The sole case summarized above indicates that the builder's loss was due to the non-appearance of their counsel, which suggests that insufficient representation or procedural non-compliance can significantly impact case outcomes.
Overall, these patterns point to the importance of adequate legal representation and procedural compliance in real estate litigation. Builders should take care to ensure their counsel is well-versed in their cases and that they adhere to all legal requirements to avoid procedural mishaps, which can often be more detrimental to their cases than the underlying disputes themselves.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.