| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the construction and real estate market, evaluating a builder's reputation is paramount for prospective homeowners. Here, we delve into Nirman Builders & Developers, a company based in Chhattisgarh that has garnered attention due to its legal track record in resolving complaints.
Builder Overview
Name: Nirman Builders & Developers
Location: Chhattisgarh
Number of Complaints: 4
Cases Won: 4
Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Details
Nirman Builders & Developers has been involved in a total of four legal cases, all of which the builder successfully won. Here’s a brief overview of each case:
- Case 1
- Appellant Claim: The applicant claimed unpaid maintenance charges for the flat despite using the facilities.
- Respondent Claim: The non-applicant contested that promised facilities were not provided.
- Verdict: The Authority ruled the non-applicant to pay Rs. 79,450.
- Case 2
- Appellant Claim: Similar to Case 1, unpaid maintenance charges were claimed by the applicant.
- Respondent Claim: Again, the non-applicant claimed the lack of promised facilities justified not paying.
- Verdict: The non-applicant was ordered to pay Rs. 93,440.
- Case 3
- Appellant Claim: The applicant claimed unpaid maintenance charges.
- Respondent Claim: The same contention from the non-applicant regarding facilities was raised.
- Verdict: Rs. 89,770 was the amount ordered to be paid by the non-applicant.
- Case 4
- Appellant Claim: Unpaid maintenance charges of Rs. 84,460 were claimed.
- Respondent Claim: Non-availability of promised facilities was again the core of the defense.
- Verdict: The Authority ordered payment of Rs. 84,460.
Legal Analysis
Cases Won
A clear pattern emerges from the winning cases of Nirman Builders & Developers. The common factor centers around unpaid maintenance charges. Each case involved claims for maintenance charges associated with a residential project. Despite the non-applicant’s claims of unprovided facilities, the Authority consistently upheld the builder’s right to collect these charges, highlighting the necessity for buyers to abide by service agreements once they utilize available facilities.
Cases Lost
Interestingly, it is notable that Nirman Builders has not lost any cases to date. This suggests a strong legal strategy and adherence to maintaining the promised quality and functionality of their projects. The absence of lost cases reflects well on the builder's operational transparency and reliability.
Conclusion
In summary, Nirman Builders & Developers stands out due to its impeccable legal track record, winning all four related cases thus far. Their ability to effectively manage disputes over maintenance charges indicates a solid commitment to customer service, while also signifying the importance of maintaining contractual responsibilities.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Understand the builder’s history and legal status in depth.
- Review Facilities in the Brochure: Compare the promised facilities against those actually provided.
- Understand Your Obligations: Be clear on maintenance charges and services availed to avoid disputes.
- Inspect Previous Projects: Visit completed projects to assess quality and service directly.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Reviews and Ratings: Explore reviews, ratings, and testimonials from previous clients.
- Confirm Legal Standing: Ensure there are no unresolved legal issues or a history of complaints against the builder.
- Examine Contracts Carefully: Read the fine print before signing any agreements to avoid misunderstandings in the future.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially sound builder is more likely to complete projects on time and without issues.
By considering these aspects, potential buyers can ensure a more informed and secure home-buying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Nirman Builders & Developers, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily involve two recurring themes: the contention over non-payment of maintenance charges and claims of non-compliance with promised facilities. Each of these disputes hinges on the non-applicant's argument that they are not liable for maintenance charges due to a perceived failure of the builder to deliver certain facilities that were promoted when they purchased their properties.
In these cases, the builder commonly brought litigation forward to ensure the collection of outstanding maintenance fees, which they argued were due because the non-applicants continued to benefit from the communal amenities and services provided in their projects. The frequent justification by the non-applicants was predicated on claims of inadequate or incomplete facilities, such as the absence of promised amenities featured in the promotional materials.
A pattern that emerges from the summarized cases is the nature of the disputes around financial obligations owed to the builder for the use of services that the buyers continued to partake in, despite the disagreements about the quality or availability of certain facilities.
The reasons the builder managed to secure favorable verdicts in these disputes can be attributed to several factors. A recurring theme in the rulings seems to stem from the insufficient evidence presented by the opposing party, which often failed to substantiate claims of non-compliance with the promised facilities. Additionally, the ruling authorities noted that the non-applicants did not adequately demonstrate that the alleged failure of the builder to provide such facilities exempted them from their financial obligations, often leading to judgments in favor of Nirman Builders & Developers.
This analysis sheds light on the reputation of Nirman Builders & Developers in the real estate market. While genuine disputes may arise from time to time, the builder appears to have a robust defensive stance against accusations that could be categorized as either false or exaggerated. It emphasizes that while buyers can sometimes feel aggrieved, they must approach such situations carefully, as they may not always have a solid legal backing for their claims.
For potential buyers, this case analysis underscores the importance of making informed decisions. While legitimate disputes certainly exist within real estate, it is apparent that builders like Nirman Builders & Developers possess the means to defend themselves against unjust claims effectively. Therefore, buyers are encouraged to investigate claims critically and seek reliable information before drawing conclusions about a builder’s reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-S20-2023-0990 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, M/s Nirman Builders and Developers… | ["Non-payment of ma… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Nirman Builders and… | Mrs. Smita Kedia | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-REA-2023-01990/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_e9d2b5f9-49ed-44da-a0fc-0f018aa23db2.pdf |
| 4॥-?shr20-2023-0992 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, M/s Nirman Builders and Developers… | ["Non-payment of ma… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Nirman Builders and… | Shri Prabin Kedia | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2023-01992/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_6a7fbcb5-90ec-4ded-ad04-b06b89d50ff4.pdf |
| 4-S20-2023-0988 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, M/s Nirman Builders and Developers… | ["Non-payment of ma… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Nirman Builders and… | Mrs. Shabnam Kedia | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-REA-2023-01988/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_bd9eb43a-8672-47ab-b119-7712287d0edd.pdf |
| A-RH/-2023-0993 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, M/s Nirman Builders and Developers… | ["Non-payment of ma… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Nirman Builders and… | Mrs. Anuradha Kedia | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-REA-2023-01993/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_7c23395a-a55c-497f-a374-e8e2954e9ce7.pdf |