| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the construction and real estate market, evaluating a builder's reputation is paramount for prospective homeowners. Here, we delve into Nirman Builders & Developers, a company based in Chhattisgarh that has garnered attention due to its legal track record in resolving complaints.
Builder Overview
Name: Nirman Builders & Developers
Location: Chhattisgarh
Number of Complaints: 4
Cases Won: 4
Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Details
Nirman Builders & Developers has been involved in a total of four legal cases, all of which the builder successfully won. Here’s a brief overview of each case:
- Case 1
- Appellant Claim: The applicant claimed unpaid maintenance charges for the flat despite using the facilities.
- Respondent Claim: The non-applicant contested that promised facilities were not provided.
- Verdict: The Authority ruled the non-applicant to pay Rs. 79,450.
- Case 2
- Appellant Claim: Similar to Case 1, unpaid maintenance charges were claimed by the applicant.
- Respondent …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Nirman Builders & Developers, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily involve two recurring themes: the contention over non-payment of maintenance charges and claims of non-compliance with promised facilities. Each of these disputes hinges on the non-applicant's argument that they are not liable for maintenance charges due to a perceived failure of the builder to deliver certain facilities that were promoted when they purchased their properties.
In these cases, the builder commonly brought litigation forward to ensure the collection of outstanding maintenance fees, which they argued were due because the non-applicants continued to benefit from the communal amenities and services provided in their projects. The frequent justification by the non-applicants was predicated on claims of inadequate or incomplete facilities, such as the absence of promised amenities featured in the promotional materials.
A pattern that emerges from the summarized …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from NIRMAN BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.