CIN | U45200OR2015PTC019629 |
---|---|
Year Established | 4-Dec-15 |
Address | GANDHI NAGAR 2ND LANE PLOT NO 214 BERHAMPUR Ganjam OR 760001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Nuage Edifice Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in the state of Odisha. In this blog post, we will examine the available data regarding the builder’s legal history, including the number of complaints, cases, and their overall performance in the legal arena. This insight will help potential buyers make informed decisions when considering properties developed by this builder.
From the data provided, Nuage Edifice Private Limited has received one complaint, and it appears that they have not successfully won any cases. Instead, they have lost one case, which indicates a significant legal challenge concerning their operations or customer service when it comes to fulfilling contractual obligations.
The details of the lost case are crucial for understanding why the builder did not fare well in this particular instance. The case resulted in the builder being directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 10,000 and was mandated to upload all required Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs). This suggests that there may have been issues surrounding transparency or compliance with regulatory requirements, which should be a red flag for potential buyers.
On the other hand, while Nuage Edifice Private Limited has one case won, the summary does not provide specifics about the claims made by either party. The outcome of the won case includes a penalty that the builder must pay, meaning the verdict did not favor the builder, highlighting a lack of favorable rulings overall.
The primary indicator from the legal data points to potential compliance issues. Losing a case due to failing to submit necessary documentation (like QPRs) raises concerns about the builder's operational protocols. Such a pattern indicates that buyers should be vigilant about the builder’s adherence to project timelines and reporting requirements.
With just one won case identified, it lacks substantial data for a thorough pattern analysis. However, the nature of the verdict suggests that even in favorable rulings, penalties or mandates imposed indicate a recurring potential deficiency in fulfilling obligations satisfactorily.
Overall, Nuage Edifice Private Limited has a concerning legal track record with one complaint and no victories in legal challenges. The single lost case further emphasizes issues related to transparency and regulatory compliance. For those considering purchasing from this builder, it is essential to proceed with caution and possibly seek legal counsel.
By adhering to these insights and guidelines, buyers can protect themselves and make informed decisions in their real estate ventures.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Nuage Edifice Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into penalties for project delays, non-compliance with municipal orders, and disputes over project requirements.
The first type of case frequently observed involves the builder facing penalties due to delays in project completion. In one notable instance, the builder was directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 10,000, indicating a pattern where builders may not meet the expected timelines, leading to legal consequences.
Another recurring theme is the builder's non-compliance with municipal orders and project requirements. While specific details of the claims and defenses were not provided in the summary, the common factor of penalties suggests that Nuage Edifice may have failed to uphold regulatory standards or provide necessary documentation, including Quality Project Reports (QPRs).
The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to adhere to standards, resulting in delays or inadequate project delivery. This highlights a significant area of concern for potential buyers who expect timely and quality fulfillment of projects.
The builder's losses in these cases point to several failures, notably non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and a lack of diligent documentation. The direct mention of penalties implies that Nuage Edifice did not meet the required project timelines and specifications, leading to legal repercussions. Overall, these cases reflect common issues in real estate that buyers should be wary of, emphasizing the importance of thorough due diligence when engaging with builders.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["Violation of RERA… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Nuage Edifice Priva… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/129-of-2024-1.pdf |