| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth and successful purchasing process. Today, we delve into the activities of Om Associates, a builder operating in Gujarat and Maharashtra. We will examine their legal history, including the number of complaints against them and the outcomes of these legal challenges. This analysis aims to inform potential buyers about what they might expect when dealing with Om Associates.
Builder Profile
Builder Name: Om AssociatesNumber of Complaints: 3
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 3
Legal Case Overview
Om Associates has faced a total of three complaints in legal cases, and unfortunately, they have lost all three. In analyzing the details of these cases, several patterns can be discerned, both in instances they faced legal challenges and those they did not win.Analysis of Cases
Cases Lost:Om Associates has not been victorious in any of the cases brought against them. The absence of winning outcomes can be a red flag for potential buyers, as this pattern indicates a recurring inability to adequately defend their practices or ensure compliance with legal obligations.
Patterns in Lost Cases:
Lack of Compliance: The most notable theme is the failure to meet regulatory requirements. For instance, compliance with submitting annual audit reports is highlighted.
Consequences: The authority imposed penalties, including fines, illustrating a lack of preventative measures and adherence to legal standards by the builder.
Cases Won:
On the flip side, Om Associates has shown some procedural activity in their cases, leading to verdicts that, while may not reflect a victory in a traditional sense, did result in some legal progress. However, it's important to note that all outcomes still underscore the builder's challenges.
Patterns in Cases with Outcomes:
Amendments and Legal Representation: In cases where the builder sought to amend titles and bring legal representatives on record, this showcases a level of engagement with the legal process but does not equate to a successful outcome for the builder.
Conclusion
In summary, Om Associates’ legal history reflects serious concerns regarding their operational practices and compliance with regulations. With a total of three complaints resulting in lost cases, potential buyers might consider these aspects when deciding whether to engage with this builder.Tips for Potential Buyers
1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate the legal history of any builder you are considering. Om Associates’ track record should prompt further inquiry into their project management and compliance.2. Request Documentation: Ensure all necessary legal documents and reports are presented before making a purchase. Unsubmitted reports and compliance information are often red flags.3. Engage Legal Expertise: Consult with a legal professional before making any decisions to better understand your rights and protections when buying a property.General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews and Complaints: Look online for customer testimonials and any complaints lodged against the builder.- Evaluate Projects: Visit ongoing or completed projects to assess the quality of construction and design.- Ask for References: Obtain references from previous clients of the builder to gauge their reliability and service quality.By keeping these insights in mind, you can make more informed decisions and hopefully avoid potential pitfalls in your home-buying journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Om Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance issues, delay-related disputes, and procedural matters.
The first type of case involves regulatory compliance issues, particularly concerning the submission of annual audit reports. In one case, the builder was fined for failing to submit the annual audit report for the project 'Royalisa' within the prescribed time limit. The builder's defense of 'unforeseen circumstances' was insufficient to mitigate the penalty, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal requirements in real estate projects.
Delay-related disputes constitute another significant theme in these cases. While specific details of claims and counter-claims were not provided in all instances, the outcomes suggest that parties often disputed project delays and the accountability associated with them. This is a common trigger for litigation in the construction sector, as delays often result in additional costs and losses for various stakeholders.
Procedural matters also figured prominently in the verdicts, with several cases involving amendments to appeal titles and the service of notices to non-applicants. These outcomes highlight the complexities of legal procedures in real estate litigation and the need for builders to ensure compliance with procedural requirements to protect their interests.
The reasons for Om Associates' losses in these cases are varied. Insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with regulatory deadlines, and potential misunderstandings of their obligations under the law were likely contributing factors. The frequent appearance of procedural issues in the verdicts suggests that the builder may also have experienced challenges in navigating the legal framework surrounding real estate projects.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance of meticulous compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, effective project management to prevent delays, and a thorough understanding of procedural matters for builders operating in the real estate sector. Buyers should take note of these patterns when evaluating builders' track records and reliability.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT005000000052959 | Maharashtra | Application for bringing legal representatives of… | ["Legal Representat… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | 2 Ors. | Om Associates | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Zu4Mvz94c1qTONOtcJbaprBlsF_wNtMI |
| GJ/CMP/NCAR/Ahmedab… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Om Associates | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1KvEjZVhBkhPnGuVtydi0S5GVXnJyJCTe |