| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, buyer trust is paramount, yet legal challenges can often cloud a builder's reputation. This post delves into OM Developers, a builder based in Gujarat, examining the legal disputes they've faced and offering guidance for potential buyers.
OM Developers: An Overview
OM Developers has faced a total of 9 complaints, culminating in 1 case won and 8 cases lost. The legal battles reflect a pattern of compliance issues, particularly surrounding the timely submission of quarterly reports mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
OM Developers encountered legal difficulties in all 8 lost cases, primarily related to the following themes:
- Non-compliance with Reporting Requirements: Each case involved the failure to submit quarterly reports, with penalties imposed by the authority for these infractions. The common theme across these cases was allegations of willful negligence or ignorance regarding …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against OM Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases primarily revolve around issues of compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and the obligations imposed on builders under this legislation.
The most common theme among the cases is the builder's Failure to Submit Quarterly Reports. In multiple instances, the authority found that OM Developers had not adhered to the requirement of filing quarterly project reports on the RERA web portal. This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with regulatory obligations, which is a major concern for prospective buyers who rely on transparency in the real estate market.
Non-Compliance with RERA Instructions is another significant theme. The builder was penalized for violating specific instructions regarding project reporting and disclosure. The reasons provided for this non-compliance varied, including technical issues and lack of awareness, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder OM DEVELOPERS, which it lost, reveals a consistent pattern regarding their disputes primarily focused on non-compliance with reporting obligations. The cases can be grouped into several key themes. Firstly, there were significant issues related to 'Non-compliance with Reporting Obligations,' where the builder failed to submit required quarterly reports in a timely manner. The repercussions of this non-compliance are further emphasized under themes such as 'Penalties for Failure to File' and 'Repeated Non-compliance Despite Reminders,' indicating that despite multiple notifications, the builder did not rectify their reporting delays. Additionally, cases mentioned 'Willful Negligence in Regulatory Compliance' which points towards the perception of intent behind the builder's failure to act.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court to contest penalties resulting from their late or nonexistent submissions, often claiming various reasons for the delays. This illustrates a pattern where OM DEVELOPERS sought to …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, OM DEVELOPERS, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around regulatory compliance issues, specifically concerning the timely submission of reports required under the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act. Among the notable themes identified, there are instances of disagreements over reporting obligations where the builder was accused of late submissions. Additionally, the cases also touched on penalties for minor infractions, highlighting a pattern where the builder faced scrutiny for perceived failures that were ultimately seen as non-critical.
The common reasons for these litigations appeared to revolve around contesting penalties imposed for alleged non-compliance with RERA regulations. In these cases, OM DEVELOPERS often sought to challenge claims regarding project delays or regulatory failures attributed to circumstances beyond their control. A frequent trigger for these cases seemed to be the claims from authorities or external parties who accused the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from OM DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.