| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Understanding OM INFRA: A Detailed Review of Complaints and Legal Cases
In the competitive realm of real estate, the reputation and legal standing of builders are critical aspects for potential buyers. Today, we delve into OM INFRA, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, analyzing their track record based on recent legal encounters. This blog post will explore the substantial complaints against OM INFRA, the outcomes of these legal battles, and what potential buyers need to consider before making a purchase.
OM INFRA: Overview
With four recorded complaints against them, OM INFRA has a concerning record in the courts, having lost all four cases filed against them. While their presence in the market is established, the legal outcomes warrant attention, especially for homebuyers interested in their projects.
Legal Case Details
Cases Filed Against OM INFRA
OM INFRA faced four legal challenges, all resulting in unfavorable verdicts for the builder. Below is a summary of the claims and outcomes:
- Violation of RERA Advertisement Regulations: An appellant claimed OM INFRA failed to include necessary RERA registration details in their advertisements. The verdict resulted in a fine of Rs. 75,000.
- Failure to Receive Authority Notice: In another case, OM INFRA asserted they did not receive a notice from the authority, leading to a penalty of Rs. 60,000.
- Non-Submission of Project Reports: OM INFRA was penalized Rs. 50,000 for not filing a quarterly report for their project 'Bageshree Township-9.'
- Withdrawal of a Case: One case was withdrawn by the complainant.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Common Factors in Lost Cases
- Recurring Non-Compliance: The primary commonality in the lost cases is OM INFRA’s failure to comply with regulations set under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This includes not filing necessary project reports and failing to provide essential information in advertisements.
- Lack of Communication: In cases where the builder claimed they had not received notifications, it raises concerns about their internal communication processes.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Interestingly, OM INFRA has not won any of the four cases against them. This showcases a pattern of persistent legal challenges, with the authority frequently ruling against the builder.
Conclusion: An Overall Assessment of OM INFRA
Based on the legal data, OM INFRA presents a troubling picture for potential buyers. Their inability to win any cases and the nature of the complaints highlight serious compliance issues with regulatory practices. The fines imposed indicate not just legal shortcomings but also a potential lack of sufficient oversight in their operations.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Before making any commitments, conduct extensive research on the builder’s compliance history and reputation.
- Inquire About Future Projects: Ask about ongoing and future projects, and ensure that all necessary documents and registers are in order.
- Engage Legal Expertise: If considering a purchase from OM INFRA, consult with a legal expert familiar with real estate regulations to ensure your rights will be protected.
- Examine Customer Reviews: Look for testimonials and reviews from past buyers to gauge the overall satisfaction and experiences with the builder.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting a Builder
- Verify Credentials: Always verify the builder's credentials including their RERA registration.
- Review Contracts Carefully: Examine all terms of sale and project timelines laid out in the contract to avoid future legal issues.
- Stay Informed About Market Trends: Understanding the market can help gauge the builder's standing and reliability.
- Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off during the purchasing process, it’s vital to address those concerns or seek alternatives.
In conclusion, while OM INFRA has established a presence in Gujarat, the alarming number of legal complaints and losses in court should make potential buyers think critically about their decision to engage with this builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder OM INFRA, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance, failure to submit required documentation, and penalties for project delays.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, is exemplified by the case where the builder was fined for not mentioning their RERA registration and website in advertisements. This highlights a pattern where builders may not fully adhere to the regulatory requirements set forth by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, leading to legal repercussions.
The second theme, failure to submit required documentation, is seen in the case where the builder did not file a quarterly report for their project 'Bageshree Township-9.' The builder defended this omission by citing unforeseen circumstances, but ultimately received a penalty, demonstrating the importance of maintaining proper documentation and complying with reporting requirements in real estate projects.
The third theme, penalties for project delays, is a common strand throughout the cases. Builders were imposed with fines not only for non-compliance and lack of documentation but also for delays attributed to their projects. This shows that one of the primary concerns for the authorities is ensuring that projects move forward in a timely manner, and any delays will be met with penalties.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court against OM INFRA primarily revolved around contesting these penalties and the builder’s failure to meet regulatory standards. There was also a case that was disposed of due to the withdrawal of the complaint, which highlights the fact that not all disputes necessarily result from willful non-compliance; some may stem from misunderstandings or unique circumstances.
The builder lost these cases chiefly due to insufficient evidence to defend their actions, non-compliance with legal requirements, and a lack of timely submission of essential reports. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that OM INFRA faced challenges related to adherence to the RERA regulations and timelines, which reflects a common issue in the real estate sector where regulatory compliance and effective project management are crucial to avoid legal disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/VADODARA/2201 0… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case disp… | Withdrawal of compl… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Manish Ashokbhai So… | Om Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1BXlsyyaw_zBDKwiLJgvClQ4eySKZbEXL |
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Kuteh/1… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority impo… | ["Non-filing of qua… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Om Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1xP7H_nSLEylGAD8npTXYpoMQjij0LD_c |
| GI/CMP/NCAR/KUTCH/2… | Gujarat | The promoter, Om Infra, failed to submit the annu… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Om Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ycEY4PYRvu_3gEDhWHhCQ1jP2KX1qs3G | |
| 57/2019 | Gujarat | The promoter-developer of the 'Stonegate' project… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Om Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=14KQoBOXuC3oJ5NhMnB8fWCZzYO6aYm1o |