CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a new home, the choice of builder is crucial for a smooth purchasing experience. In this post, we will delve into the background of Om Infrastructure, examining their record of legal disputes and outcomes in the state of Gujarat. With five complaints lodged against them and a 100% loss rate in court cases, potential buyers should observe caution.
Overview of Om Infrastructure
Builder Name: Om Infrastructure
Number of Complaints: 5
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 5
States with Projects: Gujarat
Legal Case Details
Summary of Complaints
- Common Allegations: A recurring theme across the complaints filed against Om Infrastructure relates to the construction quality. Homebuyers reported defects such as swollen doors, malfunctioning windows, and inadequate plumbing. Additionally, several complaints mentioned unauthorized allotment of parking spaces that should have been reserved for residents.
- Builder's Defense: In the builder's responses, they consistently denied the allegations and asserted that …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Om Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: defects in construction and unauthorized allotments, penalties for non-compliance and delayed reporting, and disputes over property documents and possession.
The majority of the cases revolve around the first theme, where the complainants alleged that the builder had constructed their apartment buildings with numerous defects where the builder failed to provide promised amenities and quality construction. They highlighted issues such as swollen doors, malfunctioning windows, and inadequate plumbing, alongside claims of unauthorized parking space allocations to commercial units.
The second theme involves penalties imposed on the builder for violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In one case, the builder failed to furnish mandatory project completion reports, which led to a direct …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!