CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
OM SAI CONSTRUCTION is a builder based in Madhya Pradesh, faced with scrutiny due to a recent legal conflict. With only one complaint registered against them, the builder has a notable yet concerning history involving their project-related legalities. Understanding the complexities surrounding this builder can guide potential buyers in their choices.
OM SAI CONSTRUCTION has been involved in a legal case where the verdict was unfavorable to them. The applicant in this case claimed deficiencies in the flat, including the absence of a lift and a separate meter for electricity, which were critical for their residency. The builder argued that all necessary facilities were provided, but the authorities found merit in the applicant’s claims. As a result, OM SAI CONSTRUCTION was ordered to compensate the applicant due to the lack of promised amenities.
In the single legal case lost by OM SAI CONSTRUCTION, the common factor was the failure to deliver promised facilities. The complaints emphasized essential services that were not provided, which impacted the residents’ ability to live comfortably in their flats. This indicates a pattern where unmet expectations regarding project specifications can lead to grievances from buyers and, subsequently, legal action.
Interestingly, while OM SAI CONSTRUCTION has won a case, the details suggest that in that situation, the claims made were disputed effectively by the builder. The arguments centered on the builder's assertion that the applicant’s decision not to reside in the flat was due to reasons other than the alleged lack of facilities, suggesting a defensive approach in legal battles. However, with only one legal battle won, it raises concerns regarding their consistency in upholding project standards.
Based on the data available, OM SAI CONSTRUCTION has a mixed to poor track record concerning legal disputes. With a complaint rate of one and a losing track record in that instance, potential buyers should proceed with caution. Although the builder has fought back in legal scenarios, the precedent set in their lost case raises serious questions about their reliability when it comes to delivering promised amenities.
In summary, potential buyers must be diligent when considering OM SAI CONSTRUCTION or any builder, prioritizing clear communication, thorough research, and proper documentation as guiding principles.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against OM SAI CONSTRUCTION, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The primary theme observed across the cases is related to Amenities and Facilities Disputes.
Many of the claims made by the applicants revolve around the promised amenities that were not delivered by the builder. For instance, the flat not having a lift and a separate meter for electricity was a major concern for the residents. This indicates that one of the common reasons people brought cases to court was the builder's failure to provide necessary facilities that could ensure a comfortable living experience.
The builder's defense often revolved around their claim of having provided the required amenities, while attributing the complaints to other reasons for the dissatisfaction of the applicants. However, the verdicts consistently favored the applicants, highlighting the builder’s inability to meet the promised standards of living.
The pattern that emerges from these summaries is that the builder’s litigation often stems from their inability to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning the provision of amenities. This suggests that the builder may have been facing challenges in delivering projects that meet the expectations of homebuyers or may have been cutting corners to save on costs.
The common reason for the builder's losses in these cases appears to be their failure to provide adequate evidence that they had indeed supplied the promised facilities. There might also be a compliance issue with regulatory requirements regarding what constitutes mandatory amenities for residential flats. Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers, emphasizing the importance of thorough verification of amenities before committing to a property.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-87[-19--0344 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant complained about lack of facilities… | ["Lack of facilitie… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | S. Anastasia Mary H… | Om Sai Construction | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/005714000900.pdf |