No Logo Available

OPTIMIZE INFRACON

3.8/5 (3 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, ensuring a transparent and reliable building partner is crucial for prospective buyers. One such builder worth examining is Optimize Infracon, which operates in Gujarat. This blog post delves into the builder's legal history, highlighting the number of complaints lodged against them, their legal outcomes, and what this means for future customers.

Overview of Optimize Infracon

Optimize Infracon has faced a total of three complaints, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. The cases reveal significant concerns regarding their service delivery, particularly in terms of timely project completion and property handover.

Legal Case Details

The complaints lodged against Optimize Infracon showcase notable issues:

  • Common Claims from Complainants: The predominant concern in cases against the builder revolved around the failure to deliver flats within the agreed timeline. Complainants voiced grievances not only about delayed possession but also sought financial restitution for the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Compensation Disputes Conveyance Deed and Possession Issues

Analysis of the cases filed against Optimize Infracon, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Refund and Compensation Disputes, and Conveyance Deed and Possession Issues.

The first type of case primarily involves claims from buyers that Optimize Infracon failed to deliver flats within the agreed-upon timelines. In two significant cases, the complainants demanded refunds of Rs. 58 lakhs, along with compensation for mental torture and financial losses. The builder's defense revolved around claims that the complainants were not bona fide purchasers and attempted to obscure the facts by alleging connivance with their partners. However, the authority ruled in favor of the complainants, ordering refunds along with interest and compensation. This pattern indicates a troubling trend where Optimize Infracon may have overpromised and underdelivered, leading to significant losses for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from OPTIMIZE INFRACON?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.